Something’s paying her 2800$/month tax free to sit on her ass and not have a job. It was paying for a four bedroom house for her, but she decided that paying rent out of the handouts was beneath her, so she got evicted. The point is that this one is, whether it’s welfare or some other government hand out, a professional benefit receiver and has been since she was 17 years old. Her kids know no other life. People who game the system are good at it, and they continue to do it as a lifetime occupation.
The lady I’m referring to is my best friend’s sister. She’s getting welfare, WIC, and health insurance for her kids, as well as free birth control shots (finally) for herself. The reason that I know the income is 2800$/month is that it was discussed, with me present, when she and her on-again, off-again boyfriend hit up my friend’s mother for a loan to buy a truck despite the fact that neither the sister nor the sometimes boyfriend have a driver’s license.
There was a rather large arugment over the amount of money spent on Christmas presents, at which point the sister whipped out some bank statements with the monthly deposits on them. Most of the money is spent on junk food and cigarettes, except of course the WIC money which has to be spent on the approved list of foods and juices.
Income of 2800$/month means that she’s got an annual income of 33,600$, on which she pays no withholding tax. That’s also the before child support shows up, because each kid has a different father and none of the fathers are the current sometimes boyfriend.
Exactly what kind of unskilled job that a high-school dropout with no GED or transportation or work history could perform in an economically depressed former steel mill town is there that should have a net income of 33,600$/year?
This person that I’m talking about has two parents who have both got high school diplomas, are still married to each other, are both employed, own their own home, raised a son who is college educated and gainfully employed, and definitely qualify as middle class.
She’s got no ‘cycle of poverty’ excuse for being a professional benefit receiver, but that’s what she is.