I can live with that. You still haven’t answered if you’re a masochist or a troll, though.
What am I sidestepping, exactly? Pardon me if I missed an actual question somewhere in the vomitous mass that you call “posting.”
I’m 27. Which you could easily have figured out by visiting my profile.
Swearing does not necessarily indicate anger. In this case, there is nothing here that I could possibly be bothered to be angry about.
Since I am not good at reading minds, I wasn’t able to answer this prior to it being asked. The answer is - neither.
Apparently you cannot read, or perhaps are unable to comprehend words over one syllable. I said you are sidestepping discussing your original stupid remarks, on the original subject of this thread. Remember that? I know you prefer to just act like an immature bitch rather than discuss anything, but it also appears that you are incapable of defending yourself when someone of at least average intelligence calls you on one of the many dumb things you say.
I was curious to see if a direct response from you was at all possible.
If true, the 27 does explain quite a bit.
Just shut up already, you old bag.
Riiiight - because calling someone an immature bitch indicates that you’re perfectly calm. Apathetic, even. Are you convincing yourself of this crap? Because you’re not convincing any of us.
And what’s wrong with being 27?
Apparently you are incapable of making a negative observation without being angry. That is not true of everyone else. For example, I can say that you are acting almost as immature as SFG with complete calmness.
Nothing at all. It just depends on what you do with it.
Please show where I’ve sidestepped anything, is what I’m saying, you vapid whore. If I missed a question from you, I’m sure it wasn’t intentional. Sometimes the shit you vomit forth just sort of glides past my eyes since I can’t force my brain to actually assemble it into coherent sentences without getting the urge to rip out my own reproductive organs to avoid even the slightest possibility of ever giving birth to a daughter who’d turn out remotely like you.
Personally, I hold down an important and well paid position while being very well liked by my friends, my boyfriend, and my boyfriend’s cats’. As opposed to sitting on my fat ass all day slurping up lard sundaes paid for by the government and my husband’s mysterious blue credit card while resting my feet on tiny yap dogs as I talk to a bunch of people on the internet who mostly can’t stand me.
I love my blue credit card!
As far as I can tell, **curlcoat **likes to ask people how old they are (she’s done it in many threads) so that she can dispense her one and only zinger - “you’re so immatuuuuure”. She clearly feels that this is devastating repartee, despite the fact that it is usually based solely on the fact that the poster in question disagrees with her. She doesn’t even seem particularly sure of how this line of reasoning *should *work - note that she asked you how old you were, said that being 27 ‘explained quite a bit’ about you, then (when pressed) said that actually being 27 was fine. So, what the hell was the point of asking?
Anyways, I think I have figured out why she falls back so often on this perceived insult. This is a person who has never achieved a blessed thing in her entire life - she has no education, no job skills, has never been capable of supporting herself, has no understanding of the world at large, and nobody likes her. The one and only thing she has ever done correctly is getting old. No wonder she thinks of aging as a significant accomplishment - getting to the age of 70-billion or whatever she is is literally the only thing in the world that she has available to lord over *anyone *else. Unfortunately she doesn’t seem to realize that older does not equal wiser.
As an arguing technique it doesn’t make a whole hell of a lot of sense, but then for someone with a room-temperature IQ it’s probably about the best she can do.
i walk 2 beagles everyday. Winston thinks anybody he meets should take a minute to pet him. He wants his pet jobs. Nordberg just stands back and watches. I can not imagine the circumstances necessary for them to bite someone. They are sweet and don’t think people are threats.
They know what purpose people have. To feed them and pet them.
Just in case you actually intend to get back on subject, you started deflecting somewhere near post 181.
That would not be a bad thing.
Since I am to assume that last bit was supposed to be me, and it is very far off the mark, I have quite a bit of trouble believing what you say about yourself. Particularly since those who feel a need to go on about how great they are tend to be people who aren’t.
Hardly - are you really that dumb? Go up and look at the exchanges with SFG - she is neither agreeing nor disagreeing, she is simply throwing garbage around like a three year old. Hence the immature.
I’m sorry you aren’t smart enough to follow that. The difference, which would be obvious to anyone with half a brain, is that SFG’s being in her 20’s explains why she thinks she is all that and knows everything, given the way many in that generation were raised, not to mention that kids of that age in any generation tend to be know-it-alls. When you later ask what is wrong with being 27, I quite logically say there is nothing wrong with it, but obviously how a person of that age acts will have much to do with whether or not he/she is taken seriously. Despite SFG’s continual claims to universal love, I haven’t noticed that much of anyone takes what she posts seriously.
That is really rather pathetic on your part. Given how you stalk me, I’d think you would know that I graduated high school (back when that was actually an education), I worked for decades so obviously I have job skills, I supported myself during those decades (gee I’m sorry my husband makes enough & we have been smart enough with that money that I don’t have to work now), and even in here, where I have no need for friends, there have been a few who have said they like me. As for understanding the world, you don’t seem to have much of a grasp of the world outside your own experience yourself.
Now, if all the two of you have to offer is more really dumb insults, you’ll be doing it alone. Once again proving Idle Thoughts wrong…
That **curlcoat **is an idiot or a troll, I guess.
So you can’t actually give a cite for anything I deflected. I am shocked. Shocked.
Bwahahahahahahaha. The woman who is a walking definition of hypocrisy and willfull ignorance is saying this about me? Newsflash, dear: even a cursory search of this site will turn up many, *many *instances of me admitting when I’m wrong.
Can’t it be a bit of both?
She is still insisting that there is nothing wrong with being 27, but there is something wrong with being in your 20s because those darn kids these days think they know everything. She sees no contradiction in this. I guess her view is that there was nothing wrong with being 27 back in 1918 when she was that age, and there is also nothing wrong with being a crusty old bag who thinks they know everything. Just as long as your not younger than her and dare to call her out on her bullshit. I wonder what would happen if you told her you were 65 or something? It would probably cause her head to explode.
I’d also like to point out that she is now claiming that she supported herself for decades, despite the fact that in previous threads it was all doom and gloom and we were supposed to feel sorry for her because she lived in a house with no heat and ate paper. I wouldn’t call that supporting yourself. I also have my doubts that she graduated high school, given her (previously mentioned) room-temperature IQ, but maybe it was easier back then?
This what I came here to say but gonzomax beat me to it. Thread over, right here folks.