I don’t know how effective it will be, and I don’t really claim to. I’ve said that Trump messed it up because he is a racist at heart.
I personally think the Harris “We won’t go back” message is great and have no problem with a female President.
I also think that what Trump is trying to do will have a noticeable effect in the swing states and we should address that.
When YouTube sees weird numbers like that they conclude that either; your channel has a fuck ton of not engaged subs, or you bought subs.
(Which (buying subs) is a great way to get your channel suspended or banned since it violates ToS.)
Ok so I will back down and change it to views matter for the sake of debate. All the videos I linked are now in the 10’s of thousands of views with Logan’s video at over 200K views.
Are my links still invalid now?
This site says that:
IIRC, the guy you specifically cited in the other thread had 1 million subscribers; based on the cite above, he’s being effective if he’s averaging 80K to 120K views on his videos.
Based on the views numbers you shared, it sounds like he may be averaging somewhere in that range.
https://viralyft.com/blog/youtube-subscribers-to-views-ratio
Out of 47.9 million people . . . oh, I’m forgetting not all of them are the right gender and who knows how many of them are real Blacks?!
Surely 0.416667% is a bigerest number!
As I’ve been saying it depends on where the numbers are located. Does it matter in New York State where I am? No of course, not.
Biden won some states in 2020 only by like 10,000 votes, a half a percent loss in the vote is a huge number in those states. And that is just assuming the baseline numbers are the same.
Remember that a percentage of the older black population that came out hard for Biden in 2020 is no longer here in 2024.
You do see the problem here, don’t you? You understand why Trump is being advised to chip away on this margin.
I know people here don’t like it because I’m saying it, but it needs to be addressed. I don’t want to say I told you so if the black vote turnout winds up being weak enough for Trump to win.
You are a stupid, stupid little man, who has no idea of how stupid he is.
When we look up Dunning-Kruger, your picture pops up.
That. Is. All.
So my other link on project 2025. The creator has 140k subs and the video has 35K views, so that is effective by your own standards, would you agree to that?
Yes, I’m stupid have a nice day.
For that video, yes, but I wouldn’t want to make a general statement based on only one video. What kind of views does that creator typically average?
It was for crowmanyclouds he said they were bought.
I changed to your standards.
There’s still a big problem with that.
I’m subscribed to, and watch, a bunch of channels that present ideas I do not agree with.
I don’t have a clue how one would go about sifting the agrees from the disagrees, but I do know the view numbers alone can not tell you that.
You say you’re stupid?
This, I believe.
Yes sure I’m stupid
I didn’t say that. You seem to have a real problem with the difference between what people actually say and what you need them to have said to discount the actual point they were making.
If only there was a word that described doing that…
You implied the subs were bought, I concede to the advertising expert on the number of views which you say are the real metric, and he confirms it is within range for 140k subs. They would pay to advertise on his channel.
Your 50k view threshold number is made up, even according to the suit on this board.
You are playing games, did you come out and say they are bought? No, you implied that my cites are bull because I’m posting them feeding into the echo chamber here.
It says that that guy’s ratio is in the range of “effective,” given the size of that YouTuber’s subscriber base. @crowmanyclouds’ point, as I understand it, is that that particular YouTuber doesn’t have a large subscriber base, and doesn’t get many views. Thus, his influence, in the absolute, is not large.
Again, may I suggest you educate yourself on the difference between imply and infer?
And I never said he was a giant personality; we are talking about elections and margins here. I was pointing out that Trump is hitting talking points on these channels or at least trying to.
I could say for sure if you looked at the demo of his channel it would be mainly young black male viewers.
And that is just one channel.
No fuck you. You imply, I infer