I pit stupid partisan schoolteachers

First, the setup…

But don’t cry for Ms. Pillai-Diaz just yet! As it turns out, she’s a bald-faced lying <expletive of your choice>…

I don’t care what side of the aisle you want to sit on – telling students in a public school that you’re “glad they’re not old enough to vote,” or that they “should be ashamed to be a _____” deserves nothing but derisive jeers.

Shiba Pillai-Diaz – :wally of the Week

Meanwhile that partisan piece of shit Colin Quinn leads his show with this story without the aspect of truth, painting this dishonest bitch as a victim of repressive democrats.

:mad:

I had a teacher that was like this, but he thought he was subtle. He would say “I won’t tell you my opinion on this, but…”, followed by his opinion on the subject. The most prominent example of this that sticks in my mind:

“I won’t tell you my opinion on abortion, but I’ll just say this: there wouldn’t be such a controversy over it if there weren’t something inherently evil about it.”

I didn’t know whether to laugh or just bang my head into my desk, so I did a little of both. He gave me a puzzled look, and I honestly don’t think he understood why I reacted that way. I guess after twenty years of spouting inconsistant middle-of-the-road “ideology” at students, it had become so ingrained that he no longer realized he was doing it. Since ours was an honors government class, the students were too smart to be affected by this to any great extent, so it was merely amusing. Nonetheless, it’s still wrong.

What the fuck is wrong with the first quote? George W. Bush is the president of the United States and John Kerry is only a senator. For anyone to insist that Kerry be put on the bulletin board is obviously as much a partisan hack as Pillai-Diaz is said to be in the second quote.

That you would pit someone for being overly partisan is ludicrous in the extreme and I say that as someone who actually *shares *your political beliefs. While people accuse **Reeder **of being our December, it’s my opinion that *you *are instead. I think I’ve seen maybe a dozen posts by you that aren’t some thinly veiled jab at Bush, Republicans, or conservatives in general if it’s even disguised at all.

I hope the lying, abrasive nature of this individual doesn’t leave any of her students (or those who interact with her) with a falsely negative opinion of democrats.

Ummm, I think that the point of the first quote is that the bulletin board nonsense was made up* by the teacher*, who was trying to get media attention and painted the story so that she looked sympathetic.

And while I accept that partisanship is going to happen and I need to deal with it (heck, I’m just as partisan as the next person), I absolutely, positively REFUSE to accept or condone partisanship in our schools. It does NOT belong here. Rjung was right to pit this scumbag of a teacher.

I kind of got sidetracked there.

While I find the hypocrisy of the OP to be overpowering, the idiocy of the teacher is even moreso as evidenced by the second quote. I’m glad someone so ignorant is no longer in the classroom.

That’s the point, there’s nothing wrong with Pillai-Diaz’s behaviour in the first quote. If she had been sacked for the situation described in the first quote, it would be ridiculous, as you suggest.

But that was not the real situation - the real situation was the second one. The first was Pillai-Diaz’s version of events, and she was lying. Many people thought as you did, and were on Pillai-Diaz’s side. There was a Pit thread on it yesterday with only Pillai-Diaz’s version.

What was wrong with the first quote is that, according to school board, it was a lie.

What’s interesting, IMO, is this.

Ok, that was a simulpost there.

Good God, Kerryites are stupid.

You didn’t even bother to read past the first paragraph, did you?

Please point out the specific line that refutes what I quoted.

Ya know, the OP wasn’t really THAT difficult to parse.

Okay, I suppose I should have actually clicked on the links and not just believed the quotes as given. For that I apologize. Thank you, **Atticus **and Sublight.

And now **Brutus **is showing it’s not just restricted to hypersensitive liberals.

I hate election years.

I was being serious, you know. Please point out the specific line that refutes what I quoted. I can and will eat crow when proven wrong, as infrequent as that is.

Howzat?

From the first quote:

From the second quote:

There was no “montage of presidents” - it was a tribute to Bush.

More info:

There is no evidence, none at all, that any parents demanded that Kerry be added to a photo montage of the presidents.

Doesn’t address what I quoted. According to the South Brunswick Board of Education, 'The claim is false 'applies to: (if you believe their statement, that is)

They don’t address the three parents who believe that Kerry is a President.

Ergo, stupid.

As to the whole ‘fired’ thing, the last paragraph in the first link addresses that nicely:

The second quote certainly doesn’t claim that there were no other presidential photos up there.

Ms. Pillai-Diaz claims there were, and judging from the outrageous actions of Kerry supporters here and elsewhere, I am inclined to believe her.