Please watch this and re-assess the good people and their intentions.
I’ll let you be the judge of how “healthy” this debate has been.
Please watch this and re-assess the good people and their intentions.
I’ll let you be the judge of how “healthy” this debate has been.
Wow, you must have been absolutely frothing at the mouth at the waste of tax dollars devoted to renaming Washington National Airport after Ronald Reagan. Hell, renaming the associated Metro stop alone cost hundreds of thousands, and the cost to state highway systems, etc., for updating the signage was way more than that.
I bet you’re pretty pissed off at the thought of those tax dollars being wasted on political correctness instead of transportation, aren’t you, Clothahump?
:dubious: Really? You weren’t aware that having a school named after an individual is generally considered a form of honoring that individual? The common expression “named in honor of” didn’t tip you off?
I did say Lanier and Reagan, not Dowling, Davis, Lee or Jackson. I understand why they’re doing the latter 4.
There are really two questions here- should they rename the schools? In two of the cases, nobody’s made a good argument why they SHOULD rename them, other than “white men, former Confederates, ergo BAD.” when in fact, there’s a county, a high school in Austin, one of the major office buildings of the Texas state capitol complex, named after Reagan, and a statue on the UT campus, none of which are being renamed or moved. The other ones who were named for people specifically on the basis of their Confederate accomplishments- yes, it is valid to rename those.
The second question is more whether it’s worth the cost and effort to actually rename them, independent of the worth of renaming them. Just because it’s valid to rename them, doesn’t mean it’s worth the money or trouble to do so. That’s what I’m questioning as being worth the money.
Maybe if it was part of a bond issue, then it would be a different story. Then the public would get to decide if nearly 2 million bucks would go to this purpose, and we’d see how they feel about that.
It’s wasting taxpayer money on political correctness. There is no reason to change the names. Thousands of kids have been through those schools and weren’t traumatized by having them named after Confederates. But I guess in today’s era of whiny libs needing safe spaces and crap like that, wasting taxpayer money is okay as long as we feeeeeeel good about it, right?
And for the 37th time, there is every reason to change some of the names. No public building (hell, anything) in the United States should be named in honor of a traitor. Period.
Conservative correctness.
How Texas Teaches History
From the link in the quote.
Texas officials: Schools should teach that slavery was ‘side issue’ to Civil War
So how much will it cost to replace all those textbooks?
How much damage is caused by teaching a right wing version of politically correct history?
Company Apologizes for Texas Textbook Calling Slaves ‘Workers’: 'We Made a Mistake
Mistake? Someone made the deliberate choice to call slaves “workers” despite the facts of history.
They may not have been traumatized, but that doesn’t mean there are no negative effects. If, every day, a kid goes to a school named after someone who believed that the kid is not fully human, and it becomes ingrained in that kid’s head that his/her school honors a man who didn’t believe that people like the kid are fully human or worthy of decent treatment, then it might have some effect on how that kid views society and authority around him.
Isn’t it possible that this could have some negative effect on the way a child views the legitimacy of authority figures? Maybe not trauma-levels, but might it lower by just a tad the respect that this child has for local institutions and authority figures like teachers, school administrators, and police officers?
If I’m right about the above, and the remaining legacies of white supremacy like honoring white supremacists actually has some effect on children, then it sounds like a pretty decent use of money to me.
If, on average, a child has X% less respect for teachers, administrators, and cops because he sees them honoring people who believed that the child was less than human, then that might possibly lead to some Y% of an increase in the likelihood of failing out of school, and Z% of an increase in likelihood of committing crimes, which would probably be much more expensive to society than the cost of renaming schools.
All those textbooks in multiple states.
I see it like deNazification. After WWII, we spent a lot of money and time and resources removing nearly every trace and remnant of Nazi authority in Germany. Imagine if we had won the war but hadn’t gone to this effort of deNazification – imagine if modern German Jews (and other ethnicities within Germany) grew up going to Hitler or Himmler high school, driving down Goebbels street, and similar… isn’t it possible that those Jews and others would grow up with less respect and trust in authorities like teachers, administrators, cops, and the like? Mightn’t that have some negative impact on some of the decisions that these kids make?
I see this as a continuing part of the incredibly and tragically slow (but still absolutely necessary) process of de-Confederization, and de-White-Supremacification. It’s absolutely entirely logical and reasonable for black Americans to view the antebellum South, the Confederate South, and even the Jim Crow South, and their leaders, in the same way that German Jews see Nazi Germany and its leaders. If our society won’t spend a little effort to change these things that still honor those that are reasonable viewed by black Americans as monstrous, then we’re sending a message to the black members of our society that their views are irrelevant, however reasonable and logical they are.
Apparently HISD is considered wealthy - in so far as the state government recaputring ~$100 million from their budget.
It would seem their annual budget is ~2500 million making the name change come in at 0.06%
You can argue their priorities but foot stomping about wastefulness might be better directed to other parts of their budget.
I linked an article questioning the removal of Sidney Lanier (and his replacement by ex-Mayor Bob Lanier). Where are the posters coming out against Sidney? I haven’t noticed any.
Personally, I don’t dislike Dick Dowling. He did a lot for Houston & did not *start *the war. Yes, he succeeded in battle & I understand anyone wanting to remove his name from their school. And from Dowling Avenue–it runs through a black neighborhood & was named to offend. (Some have proposed changing it to “Emancipation Avenue” but I prefer “Lightnin’ Hopkins Boulevard.” Fifth Ward was the Houston Bluesman’s main stomping ground.) Houston’s PTB didn’t want to use Sam Houston’s name back then–because he was an enemy of secession.
But–Robert E Lee, traitor with a snow-white reputation? Nutcase Stonewall Jackson? Jefferson Davis–generally disliked by most Southerners, too? Let them live on in the history books.
That’s State Board of Education stuff… a notorious gang of imbeciles if there ever was one. ISTR that they elected some (likely senile) crazy old woman who’s a creationist and holds all manner of other dumb-ass beliefs.
They’re the ones who decide on the state portion of the curricula, the accepted list of textbooks, and the like. Local school districts have their choice of the approved books, and how to go about teaching each grade level, etc… but the real stupid stuff is at the state level.
Personally, I attribute it to setting the board up as a body of popularly elected people from specific geographic districts. It virtually guarantees that the rural parts of the state will elect people who should BE in special ed, not making decisions about it, purely on the basis that these clowns are Republicans and conservatives, not because they’re specialists in education, or smart enough to know that the world’s not actually flat, or that cavemen didn’t herd mammoths riding T-Rexes.
http://capitolwords.org/date/2002/10/21/E1943-3_on-the-75th-anniversary-of-jefferson-davis-high-sc/
http://exhibits.library.rice.edu/exhibits/show/dick-dowling/afterlives-of-dick-dowling/5
I felt like cheering at the end. What exactly am I supposed to re-assess?
God, I hate agreeing with Clothahump.
But wouldn’t you be a lot happier if you thought they did?
He’s not worth the damage to your soul.
Still waiting to hear you confirm that you’re equally pissed off about taxpayer expenditures on the unnecessary name change of Washington National Airport to Reagan National, and/or the petitions to change street names in Quebec named after Nazis.
Or, if you’re not equally pissed off about those other examples of wasting taxpayer money on political correctness, let’s hear you explain why you think the situations are not analogous to the HISD decision.
The grammar, for one.
But also the incoherent trash vomiting from that woman’s mouth.
It that brings you to your knees, then congratulations. You’re the downfall of society.
Good day, common filth.
He answered this already.