I do not get this one. In California, under existing rules, you do not get to vote at just any polling place.
You have one designated polling place, based on your home address. If you go to a different one, the poll workers will politely guide you to your correct polling place.
Last night, I was unsure of where mine was, so I went online. We have a site where I can verify that I am registered and will direct me to the proper place.
No – what makes me right is my willingness to use and abide by the process we have all accepted as the authoritative method to make laws. I have one idea, you have another – how we decide which of our ideas becomes the law is not a new problem. It’s been solved. I accept that process. You don’t.
The first reaction of the poll workers was “we can’t help you until you get to the front of the line and we see whether your name is in the book.” There was no indication that if his name wasn’t in the book, whether they would tell him where he should go. While the poll workers were discussing among themselves whether they were allowed to give him any other advice at all, the people standing in line around him helped him figure out the answer.
Might I ask where you are located? The poll workers here in Valley O’ the Damned were very friendly.
Also, the State of California mails voter registration cards and sample ballots that also have the polling place listed. (I had lost mine :()
Virginia. And they weren’t unfriendly. Just not necessarily very helpful.
Same here. This guy apparently had forgotten to bring his.
Heh. :p:rolleyes:
Not only a lying hack, but no sense of irony either.
Hey, kuck-for-brains, there’s “sparse evidence” of any in-person voter fraud happening, either, but that didn’t stop you from bleating on about how it’s all about confidence in the system or some such vomit.
By the way, your side is starting to admit the Party’s ID arguments are full of shit.
He has such a rare gift. It’s a profound shame to see him waste it so.
Well, that’s kind of a shame, really, I was looking forward to your legalistic sophistry and semantic gymnastics trying to turn this rat’s asshole into a diamond ring. But no? Not even self-righteous bleating about liberal hypocrisy? No reminder about how voter ID laws are very, very popular?
Brave, brave, brave Sir Bricker.
And your side is starting to admit how much your side favors voter fraud.
Who in Democratic leadership admitted they are for voter fraud?
Snip.
You know what this reminds me of?
Washington surely wouldn’t miss the opinion of the illiterate.
Cite? I found this article, which found five countries with an ID requirement (India has “medium human development”, which I suppose you’d classify as uncivilised - you really do need to use operationalised terms) - none of which mandated photo ID, unlike the proposed law in Pennsylvania.
Bricker, I don’t believe you answered my query before, so I’ll put it to you again:
Is it a sound foreign policy for the US to support fascist coups in order to prevent Communist governments with popular support from ascending to power?
Wow. " A fox news whore suggests…"
I can’t tell if you are trying to be funny or sinking to their depth.
But, from your link…
Bolding mine.
Shayna trots out a former McCain strategist; I trot out a former Clinton strategist.
Is it sound medical policy to cut off someone’s leg?
That’s Gretchen Carlson saying so.
You can’t even tell the truth about something that basic, can you?
And you can’t even bother to read your own damn cites, or you’d have noticed this:
I find it funny that you think Dick Morris speaks for Democrats, but fine, where does he say that Dems are for voter fraud?
He says that Holder is using the issue to swing the Latino vote:
He’s wrong about the simplicity of getting IDs, but that’s another story.
Are you lying Bricker, or did I miss something?
This is Bricker’s way of seeming deep. Ooohhhh…
Okay, what the bloody fuck kind of messed up drugs are you on?
I give you a Republican strategist who worked on the McCain campaign specifically stating that HIS party is full of shit on this issue.
You give me FOX alleging that Democrats “must be” “for” voter fraud?
You really and truly have lost your goddamn mind, Rick. And as much as I loathe you, it’s actually rather sad to see.
I’m still reeling from the suggestion that once a vote is held on a policy that all questions about the wisdom of the policy, its motivations, its intent, and its implications and effects are forevermore settled.