I pit the Pope - What a dope

So then, why should we listen to one or the other? Which one really has sole rights to Divine Revelation, and which are just jerking us off?

Even if we did somehow discover which one has a lock on The Truth, why should we make his “brand” the law of the land, in a country that expressly forbids “Establishment”?
Wouldn’t what you say, be a giant humongous call of bullshit on all of them?

So why listen to them? Why give them such an inordinate amount of undeserved influence?

As for saying “this is not christian” I damn sure CAN say it, and then I can throw their Book in their faces… because I can read. I don’t need some phoney to tell me what it says.

On Immigration and Refugees, and charity in general:

*So show your love for the alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt. - Deuteronomy 10:19

'For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; - Matthew 25:35

Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it. - Hebrews 13:2

‘When you reap the harvest of your land, moreover, you shall not reap to the very corners of your field nor gather the gleaning of your harvest; you are to leave them for the needy and the alien. I am the LORD your God.’" - Leviticus 23:22

When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. - Leviticus 19:33-34

Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. - Ezekiel 16:49

"So I will come to put you on trial. I will be quick to testify against sorcerers, adulterers and perjurers, against those who defraud laborers of their wages, who oppress the widows and the fatherless, and deprive the foreigners among you of justice, but do not fear me,” says the Lord Almighty. - Malachi 3:5

But whoever has the world’s goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? - 1 John 3:17

"Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven. "So when you give to the poor, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, so that they may be honored by men Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. "But when you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing… - Matthew 6:1-4 *

So how do these bible thumpin’ flag wavin’ greedy heretics follow ANY of the above quoted passages?

Where does it say “screw the poor”? Where does it say “Thou shalt judge”?

*Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? *

And about those “Do as I say” and “Look how cool I am” types…

Woe to you Scribes and Pharisees, pretenders, who are like white tombs, which from the outside appear lovely, but from within are full of the bones of the dead and all corruption!

SO…
With all the things they violate, how are any of them “Christians”???

Because they’ve been “saved”.

They aren’t. They’re Christers.

This is exactly it. How do you think ordained Catholic priests could rape young boys and still have the temerity to minister? They confess, are assigned and do their penance, receive the sacrament and are thus redeemed by Christ. Then they go bugger another boy and run back through the repentance cycle, on and on and on. It is extremely convenient for them to have this handy conscience cleanser. And the excuse that original sin resulted in man coming short of god, so the fact that they are FUITH is not really their fault. It was that stupid bitch Eve who screwed everything up.

Oh Sheeesh. Your facts are wrong, as has been pointed out, but I want to comment on your mentality.

Are you one of the deluded Fox-addicts who decided that Obama thought he was the Emperor Jesus? Your whining gibberish about “Green Beret” suggests so.

No, Obama can’t hold a light to your Crusading warrior who defended the skies of Florida from the VietCong while playing frat-boy, and proudly landed his jet on an aircraft carrier when he brought peace to Iraq.

You may not be as stupid as my caricature paints, but your ignorance about the Bin Laden priorities proves you get your news from Sean Hannity or such. I will view your future posts in this light. Thanks for the heads-up.

BTW, one might try to make a case that Bush’s decision to let Bin Laden live was the wiser course. The terrorist was afraid to entertain visitors or communicate electronically so ineffective as leader; and Obama’s raid put American commandos at risk, and offended the pro-terrorist ally that was harboring the villain.

But aldiboronti didn’t make that claim. Instead he displayed ignorance about a topic those of us who read #RealNews know well.

Which #FakeNews source do you use, aldiboronti ? Will you at least fight our ignorance by telling us that? How did you decide that it was pure luck that led Emperor Jesus to succeed where Crusader Fratboy failed?

I like that word, stealing it.

But Tom Brady goes to the Super Bowl.

#SoUnfair

This being the Straight Dope, and all, the errors implied in this statement should be corrected.

There has never been a “Muslim” sacking of Rome (unless one also states that there has been a “Christian” rape of Africa and the Americas). It is true that Pope Leo IV did build a further wall, west of the Tiber, to prevent a recurrence of an 846 raid. Of course, a wall already surrounded the city preventing the Saracen pirates from entering Rome.

As part of the general expansion of the Abbasid empire, the Banu Tamim tribe, under the leadership of the Aghlabids, held what is now Tunisia and a bit east and west of that area. They invaded Sicily. Once that island was taken they rented out troops to various Italian states as mercenaries. One of those groups saw that Rome appeared to be a ripe target for plunder and attacked Rome in 846. The attack was only partially successful, (the raiders were held outside the Roman walls, although they looted two of the more important basilicas outside the walls), and they were not there for the purpose of spreading Islam–they just wanted loot. Unless one chooses to put the adjective “Christian” before every conquest of every place in North and South America, the Philippines, most of Africa and India, as well as Australia and Indonesia, placing the adjective “Muslim” in front of the attempted sack of Rome is just silly propaganda.

I will agree with all of that except the “mind your own business” part. He still thinks that homosexual activity is a sin, he just thinks its really important to welcome homosexuals into the church:

“If someone is gay and searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” -Pope Francis Very love the sinner, hate the sin; after all we all sin and if we hated sinners the world would be filled with hate rather than love.

This is in direct contract to the apocalyptic proclamations of Pope Benedict who thought that even civil unions that didn’t involve any whiff of the sacrament of marriage had to be opposed. Pope Francis opposes gay marriage (kinda vague on civil unions) but it seems like he thinks there are bigger fish to fry.

Its mostly just a shift in tone but tone is important. For example, the shift in tone means that gay organizations can now march in the St. Patricks Day Parade in NYC (a sore spot for the gay community in NYC).

Pope Francis still thinks abortion is a grave sin. But he has given every priest the ability to remove censure for abortion even if their bishop has not given them that power. This is mostly symbolic because most bishops have extended this ability to all their priests. But it is also a shift in tone and tone can be important.

Alright; including 9/11, white American-born terrorists have killed more Americans than Islamist terrorists have. Is that better?

If you don’t believe me, look it up.

So the Evil Left now has Science AND Religion on their side?

Hell, what’s left?

Yes. But don’t worry, the persons responsible for the sacking have been sacked.

nothing right

“Pope Francis delivered another criticism of some members of his own Church on Thursday, suggesting it is better to be an atheist than one of “many” Catholics who he said lead a hypocritical double life.”

Not bad.

The Spanish Inquisition … because no one expects it.

Good on him. I imagine said catholic hypocrites (much of them clergy) boiling with rage now at Francis over this sermon. The decent Catholics OTOH knew this all along, but it’s good to see a Pope express this sentiment. Very remarkable.

If this is all that he said in reference to this:

“There are many Catholics who are like this and they cause scandal,” he said. “How many times have we all heard people say ‘if that person is a Catholic, it is better to be an atheist’.”

He is referrring to the scandal created by the hypocritical Catholics, not that he is agreeing with the statement.

He might not have explicitly endorsed this statement, but everything he said quoted by Reuters implies that he does.

ETA: ok, you have a point, the pope certainly doesn’t prefer a generic atheist to a hypocritical Catholic, but it is implied that it means a decent atheist doing good works. But that may be only my interpretation.

I think those bastards should all be in prison… AND also the other scumbags who covered it up and silenced the victims. They aren’t saved. The Catholic church has always said “just mouthing words” is not enough. You have to have the actions to back it up.

That “saved” bullshit is from the other so called “faiths”.