I pit Trump's cretinous imbecile online supporters (Reddit mainly)

I waste too much of my time on other online forums (I blame insomnia). So there is a certain especially cretinous type of Trump supporter that is supporting him solely because he is “based shit poster”. Eg in other words because Trump and his social media campaign staff are experts at trolling, insulting and putdowns in as few words as possible. Most of these pimpled basement dwellers are also the kind of redpill / mens rights advocates that blame women for their inability to keep themselves free of body odour and not stutter when they talk to a female.

I’m not going to provide links but go search out The Donald and Mr Trump on reddit if you want to see the type of content these unemployable dregs think is going to win them the election. That’s right, this is the most pathetic part: Some of Trump’s social media staff have a few times picked up on posts on these forums and tweeted some variant of them from the “official” Trump twitter account. So now these low IQ, low information losers have declared that they are influencing the election and that Trump is going to win because of their “meme magic” and shit posting skills.

And they’ve created their own “safe space” echo chamber, if anyone posts in their forums questioning or dissenting they get an instant ban, so ironic considering the shit they give liberals for their so called “safe spaces”. Now I will agree that many Bernie online supporters were annoying but they would usually try to explain his policies or argue with you if you confronted them. Nope, not so with these Trump cretins, if you don’t support Trump and “Make America Great Again” you’re a “low energy cuck” and instantly banned.

If anyone knows one, I’d really love to see a forum with genuine Trump supporters where they actually try to explain his policies. Not because I want to try and argue with them and change their minds, but because I really doubt such a thing exists.

I’m so looking forward to when the Democrats unify and Obama and hopefully Bernie starts campaigning together with Clinton, Trump is going to drop like a stone, it’s going to be one of the biggest landslides in electoral history. These NEETs (not in employment or training, eg unemployable losers) will scurry back into their skanky corners blaming everyone except Trump for his failure. And you know what, if they are right and if Trump’s “shit posting” skills and one liner twitter putdowns are really enough to win an election then that’s not anything to celebrate, that’s the end of American democracy, and these losers who supported him will be some of the first victim’s in Trumps authoritarian future state. Trump was a “chad” in their words, an alpha male jock who was fucking the prom queen while they were playing NES and masturbating into their socks alone in the bedroom.

And yeah, if Clinton gets impeached or drops out, it doesn’t matter, whoever the Dems put up will still beat Trump, your “God Emperor” “absolute madman” is still going to lose even if Clinton is indicted.

this is probably what you’re looking for

I got banned from /r/the_donald for linking news articles to cite times trump has either said things that contained dog-whistle racism or times he advocated repealing some part of the bill of rights or another. A lot of Trump supporters genuinely don’t believe he said those things or they were taken out of context, and the moderators of his support sites quickly delete any dissent.

They’re not racists, they are simply tolerant enough not to criticize other people’s views on the subject!

So start your own reddit and ban anyone who likes Trump.

That’s how it works, right?

And explain, and explain, and explain. It’s the keystone of the liberal method that, if the other person continues to not accept your beliefs, you haven’t explained them enough. :wink:

I was listening to an interview with Michael Reagan. He pointed out that much of what’s being said about The Donald was said about his father as well in 1980 … don’t underestimate the voter power of cretinous imbeciles … just watch C-SPAN …

You’ve been trolled, son.

Truth in that, we prefer to repeat our explanation two or three times before we hit them with the stick.

Ask Trump Supporters is also pretty much an echo chamber, they uncritically accept Trump’s statements as true. Sure Trump is going to bring California into play in this race, forget the math, he’s TRUMP, he’s a winner, it’'l be YUGE. Cough Cough.

And yeah I know they’re trolls, I’m not pitting them for being Trolls, I’m pitting them for thinking they are actually achieving something, rather than them acknowledging it’s one big circlejerk.

Really? I’m skeptical that what’s being said about Trump, or what he’s saying, is really that comparable to anything said about or by Reagan.

What? Are you trying to whoosh me? Seemed every liberal was claiming a chimpanzee could do a better job being President, 'cause you know you can get a chimpanzee to act in a movie better than Reagan … God, I never want to see Bedtime for Bonzo again …

Is it a perfect one-to-one correspondence, no, it’s not … are there similarities, sure, that wouldn’t be a hard case to make … just change the word “Muslim” with “filthy, filthy hippy” and “Mexican” with “Mexican” and ya gotta wonder …

People accused Reagan of being racist? Sexist? Criminal? And Reagan actually said stuff construed by a large number of people as being blatantly racist, sexist, boorish? He was branded as temperamentally unsuited, with a short fuse that would likely launch a nuclear attack?

I know for sure he wasn’t accused of the same kind of inexperience as Trump, since Reagan was at least governor of a very large state.

Most people who call Reagan a racist or bigoted have started in the past 10-15 years as we’ve started to see the effects of the war on drugs and have learned about how hard he tried to stamp out AIDS as a public issue.

Did people really not call Reagan a criminal during the IC? I wasn’t around but it seems like his detractors would be jumping on the chance to slander him however possible.

Possibly, but we’re talking about an election context here, so I’m thinking in terms of the 1980 election.

Whatever … sheesh … just don’t be surprised at how many cretinous imbeciles are out there voting …

And those cretins have no relevance. What voters believe, and why, are not my concern in this particular point. What I question is Michael Reagan’s statement that the criticisms of Trump are similar to criticisms of his father in 1980. I just don’t see it. The two men and their approach seem fundamentally different to me, and I’m not at all convinced that their campaigns and personalities can be thus compared.

Ignore Michael and listen to Junior. Your blood pressure will thank you.

No argument about the cretinous imbeciles, goodness knows I encounter enough of them. But I would point out that Reagan, despite being a dangerous man who did much damage to this country, did have the gift of a light touch and gentle humor to make his propaganda garbage palatable to the citizenry. He was unfailingly charming and polite, directing his passionate demeanor toward perceived enemies of the USA – not at Americans themselves. He was a better actor than I had given him credit for.

He also knew how to utilize advisors and pull together diverse coalitions of people willing to advance his agendas. I loathed most of his policies – many of which yield rich, rotten fruit to this day – but he had the ability to make people believe the ideas just weren’t that bad.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, has the charm of a shit sandwich. I don’t know how anyone except the most gullible or willing of haters can uncritically accept his ugly spew. Did anyone anywhere ever make saying nothing sound so ugly? Yes! His online supporters do!

There’s a lot less of you than you think. Watch for a lot more Republican candidates to walk back their endorsements of Trump once it becomes clear that he’s not dialling back the crazy for the general election. Meanwhile some Republican’s are already endorsing Gary Johnson with Romney already hinting he’s going to vote for him.