Some questions for the OP about Video 1:
(a) While it’s true that some people never get deployed, what percentage are we talking about during the last 4 years of our war in Iran? If someone joined the army in the past few years, what are their realistic chances of not being deployed? Because, to me, that recruiter made it sound like the chances of not being deployed, and particularly not being deployed to Iraq, were very good. Is that the case?
(b) Do you honestly think, when the candidate expressed a desire to “make an album and then go platinum,” that he was talking about the sort of music they play in the Army Band? Do you think that the presence of an Army Band would really help advance this guy’s musical aspirations? Sure, there was stuff left out; it would have been good to see her response to his question about a Hip Hip band.
© What about, when he talks about his previous sprained wrist, and she seems to be encouraging him not to mention it “Because then the doctor gets stupid, and then he wants medical documents.” Yeah, those stupid doctors; what do they know about evaluating your health?
I guess my point here is that we should ask our military recruiters to live up to a slightly higher standard than “Carefully skirt around the truth without telling any actual lies.” They are recruiting for a job where, as we’ve seen all too clearly over the past few years, one consequence of signing up can be death in Iraq or Afghanistan. And they are recruiting for a job where, once signed up, the recruits are in for a matter of years, and can’t just turn around and decide to quit.
While the recruiter’s response in part (a) might have been reasonable 10 years ago, in our current situation i think they should be more upfront about exactly what is the likelihood of deployment.
Part (b) is not a big deal, but i really doubt that the army has very much to offer that particular kid in his music career. Not that this is a bad thing–after all, the army is not music school–but recruiters should be clear to potential recruits about exactly what opportunities are available and realistic if they join up.
And while the first two cases might be mitigated by stuff that we didn’t see in the video, i know of no possible extra, unviewed footage that might mitigate part ©. I can think of no extra context that makes it acceptable for a recruiter to tell a recruit not to mention an aspect of his medical history because the doctor will then get stupid and require documentation.
YMMV.