So I work at a video store. I’ve been there since October, at which time there was the control-freak owner who drove everyone insane, and the sweet manager who buffered the rest of us from the owner. The owner eventually wore down the manager, and she quit. Instead of hiring a new manager, he divided the duties of the manager between two clerks. This is because the owner is also one of the cheapest bastards I’ve ever met, and if he can save money on the salary of a manager and pay two clerks half of what he’d pay a full time manager, he’ll do that.
One of the things that he has those of us whom close the store do is to count the money from the day, and if the numbers don’t add up, we’re responcible. Nevermind that there are 10 people who work in the store who’s individual drawers could be off. Nevermind that the computer system doesn’t add correctly, so that the count is VERY 100% correct. It just has to be close enough to make him happy. Of course, that number changes every day.
I closed the store with another clerk last Sunday. And dispite the fact that I counted all cash twice, counted the cash box three times and double counted all credit card recipts AND despite the fact that as far as I could tell, the count was right on, the owner is now saying that it was off, and that we (one half of the pseudo-manager, owner and I) are going to have to have a “talk.” I am completely fed up with the owner, and for the amount I’m being paid (50 cents over minimum wage) it’s SOOOO not worth it.
Here is my question:
1.) Is it not a managerial task in most retail establishments to be responcible for both the change box and the daily count? Why the hell should I, who gets all the crap for being a peon, who gets the pay of a peon, have the responcibilities of a manager?
2.) Hi, Opal!
3.) Screw him. Am I right?
OK, there wasn’t any real reason for a list. I’m just livid that this ass thinks that this video store job that pays $6.75 an hour is something that I could possibly care enough about that I am willing to get reamed out for a math mistake. If he WANTED an accountant, he should have hired one. If he wanted a manager who is willing to take the heat when the count is off, he should have hired one. I am neither of those things.
Am I being unreasonable?

