In the real world, Clinton isn’t going to make a point of staking ground to the right of Obama, at least not before Sep. 2016. Bill knows what he has to say to avoid another primary defeat as well.
Very reliable sources.
No less a reliable, inside source than Dick Morris has been telling the world that Hillary was a closet lesbian since he got kicked out of Bill Clinton’s inner-circle for sucking toes. (If I recall, I think he claimed Vince Foster knew about it, and that was one of the reasons he had to go.)
And if you’re one of those skeptics that needs a secondary source, the web version of Weekly World News has also informed it’s readers of Ms. Clinton’s Sapphic proclivities. And lest you doubt WWN’s journalistic standing, let me remind you of their exclusive scoop from years ago about The Giant Mutant Hog Monster Attacking Georgia.
And I don’t want to hear any disparagement of those numerous, hard-working, right wing bloggers and talk show hosts, who have done their research and located these source documents and done their journalistic duty by informing the citizenry.
Your conclusion does not follow logically from your premise.
So, now the story is that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian and with the Muslim Brotherhood double agent Huma Abedin as well?:dubious:
So, Huma has a Jewish husband who was one of the most ardent Zionists in the House of Representatives who went so far as to insist that the West Bank wasn’t “occupied” and that there was no Israeli military presence on it, and a lesbian lover who’s almost as big a Zionist despite being a shiksa.:dubious:
As a Muslim Brotherhood agent she really sucks.
Beyond that, I kinda miss the days when the Hillary bashers were claiming she was having an affair with Vince Foster which was part of the reason he was murdered.
Then Gennifer Flowers had to go claim that Bill told her Hillary was a lesbian and the right decided that was going to be the new anti-Hillary unsupported rumor.
If there’s one thing America hates, it’s lesbians.
Yeah, there isn’t even any lesbian porn out there. 
Gallup has her fav/unfav at 59-37. About as good as it gets for a longtime public servant.
Hopeless cause, huh?
I’m kind of hoping Clinton isn’t our next POTUS if it means four years of, “See? Women have achieved parity! Sexism is over!”
Women are pretty much getting that already.
I’ve made it abundantly clear on these boards that Hillary is not my top choice to succeed Obama.
She’s actually number four on my list, after Brian Schweitzer at the top, then Elizabeth Warren, then Biden, & THEN HRC.
Of course, if she runs then nobody else apparently stands a chance given that the entire universe seems to be in love with HRC at the moment. I honestly just hope that a primary fight between her and Schweitzer would put the former Gov. en route to the VP slot. I could get behind a Clinton-Schweitzer ticket.
But I mean, I’d still vote for her over any GOP candidate, so the point is effectively muted anyway.
Yeah, I don’t know where people are getting this “polarizing figure” stuff. That was once true, but it’s outdated.
Plus she goes out of her way as a campaigner to be as unpolarizing as possible, which is one reason she lost last time. She’ll probably play it just as safe this time, especially if the polls continue to show her so strong.
I can live with Hillary Clinton as President. I’ll probably like the GOP candidate better, but there are plenty of objectionable ones I would never vote for, like Huckabee and Santorum.
Clinton is absolutely a viable candidate and I would probably vote for her. However, I don’t see her as someone can bring together both sides of the aisle any more than Obama. The GOP’s base has become so obstructionist that it seems rather impossible for anyone to succeed in that regard.
It is, of course, insanely early to be looking at polls, but let’s look at what’s out there anyway. Here’s what RealClear Politics has aggregated so far for the 2016 race.
Someone tell me if they see anything bad in there for Clinton. Cause I’m not seeing it.
Agreed. Jesus Christ himself wouldn’t be able to do it. Of course, part of that would be that they’d think Jesus was a hippy-dippy liberal, and not any sort of Real True Christian. 
So if they do work well with Clinton, will that finally prove that Obama sucks a diplomacy and negotiation?
If it’s the same Republicans (including the Tea Party folks), then at least it would demonstrate that Clinton is better at negotiating with this crowd than Obama. Or it could demonstrate that this crowd was unwilling to negotiate with a black president.
But I will be incredibly shocked if that happens.
I still think Vice President Biden will spoil any run by Hillary for the next President of the United States.
He will take the gloves off in order to win the nomination … I’m not saying VP Biden will win his parties nomination, but his mind set will be that he has nothing to lose.
If the democrats stick with a woman to run as the leader of their party they will lose due to the war with rednecks winning at the polls.
Neither Biden nor Clinton is going to run, so the question of a race between them is doubly moot.
They won’t work with her unless they decide that’s the only way they can keep their jobs.
Not only that, there are some questions about his birth…