Get it off me! GET IT OFF ME!!
Fuck if I know, you’re the one who thinks black cooties are real. Grow the fuck up.
No, I asked a serious question. Is there any circumstance under which you would label “tainted” a woman who entered into a sexual relationship with yourself, on the basis of her choosing to do so?
Dial it back. This is not a thread for personal attacks.
I disagree with this. I believe there is just as much racism - maybe more - than when I was a kid ('50s-'70s). It’s just harder to spot now.
Now this thread is tainted!
I read that south Al Pacino’s voice—This whole thread is tainted!
My wife wanted to look at houses in South Al Pacino but it’s such a bad neighborhood. Too many interracial couples.
I was going to reply about the scent of a tainted woman but, well, the mind reels.
There is definitely a slut lifestyle… ask my ex-wife. It is, AIUI, not exclusive to women. She is just the example I am aware of, personally.
First off the bigger penis thing is a pop culture myth.
Most male porn stars are white. There are some gigantic black dudes but I think it is more of a progressive women’s view.
I find many black women very attractive. Black men are all tied up in this status problem. To prove they have made it, they get a white girlfriend or wife. The white woman may just like darker men. Some of it is tied up in the members of the “white guilt” movement.
I think to most white men it is a class issue more than a race issue. Black women tend to get thought of as being more sexually promiscuous fair or not. Therefor a white woman dating a black man is considered trashy.
Why does this thread keep getting resurrected?!
So that no woman may ever forget just how tainted she is. This thread is a public service.
This is no different than people believing that if their AKC-registered bitch somehow is impregnated by a “mutt”, that she is ruined forever.
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but it’s been going on for a few years so thought I might as well contribute. I’ve been skimming through the comments and for a site with a tagline about fighting ignorance, there is a disturbing lack of unbiased and healthy deliberation on this topic. Most comments here are very narcissist, closed minded and over-simplify this deep, instinctive ideology, labeling those with different beliefs as evil, simple minded racists - unworthy of respect or recognition. In short, most are poor quality posts you could find on any other lesser site.
The phenomena of white men not wanting to date “blacked” white women is common, at least in my environment. Other areas might have a greater percentage of progressive, somewhat effeminate men who consider their open-mindedness as an attractive, marketable quality and are unlikely to discriminate on this basis; some unfortunately thinking themselves superior to those who do.
Sexually discriminating against a woman on the basis of the race of the men she has dated has in many cases very little to do with the mean-spirited belief that black men are inferior and unworthy of white women. Let me explain: White people can roughly be divided into two groups:
- those who are racially conscious - They identify as white and they want the wombs and resources of their families dedicated to raising whites. They lament the future disappearance / extinction of the white race and its unique physical traits, such as thinner facial features, pale skin, green/blue eyes and the various white hair colours. Therefore they neither want romantic involvement with blacks nor for their daughters to birth black children and don’t want to get involved with people who do not follow this same principle. These white people are not all evil racists per se and should not be treated with blind prejudice and bigotry.
- Those who are racially unconscious - they don’t identify as part of a white tribe and hence don’t worry about its demise. Why? I don’t know. They don’t mind a future where no pale skinned blondes, redheads or brunettes exist and thus don’t mind having blacks in their family. They endorse or are indifferent to a future with little human biodiversity - where everyone is racially-ambiguous with dark hair and eyes. They don’t mind having black children or their white daughters birthing black children or dating someone who was willing to have black children. They bizarrely argue that not wanting one’s race to die out implies that one believes one’s race to be superior to others. Strange that they don’t accuse those who work with the conservation of Panda bears of hating grizzlies…
White men of the 1st group cannot, or struggle to, consciously date a white woman that has dated black men, because, by extension, a white woman that has dated black men was also willing to dedicate her womb to bringing black children into this world and not her tribe’s own white children, thereby betraying her race and contributing to its slow extinction. To them, there is no greater slap in the face than this. The woman was was also willing to deprive one of the men from her tribe of a mate. Conservative white men of the 1st group simply cannot gel with a woman who they view as deviant, progressive, or even pride- and cultureless, with little respect for convention and tradition. In addition, there are a few rotten black men out there that would like to seduce, impregnate and then dump white women as an act of revenge against white people, so of course a woman that defiantly and willingly put herself in that potential scenario, because she believed she held some kind of moral high ground by not racially discriminating against potential lovers, will be less valued and avoided. You can laugh at these men for holding these views, but they are entitled to them.
Sure, many of the men who fall within this group can be the evil type of racists, who hate black men and view them as lesser human beings, but many of them are really not. It is ignorant and arrogant of the majority of posters here to claim that all men who won’t date “blacked” white women are evil racists. A love for and loyalty to your own tribe does not automatically imply a hatred for those who are different. That is an idiotic claim. The irrationality and over-simplification of the concept of racism today is potentially threatening many important social liberties. I guarantee there are many very intelligent and quality white men out there who genuinely respect and love black men as their neighbours and equals that still won’t date a white woman with a “dark past” simply because they want a woman that’s not reproductively “colourblind”, takes pride in being white, and wants white children.
Personally I would treat this like any of the big polarising relationship issues, like vegetarianism, desire to have children, political views, religion etc. Reveal your interracial dating past to your suitor as early on as possible, preferably on the 1st date - it is the respectful thing to do. If this ends the courtship then you were not ideologically compatible and both of you are much better off, and you didn’t waste precious time on building an ill fated relationship. Avoid giving in to the narcissism so common on this forum and don’t belittle someone for their personal ideological opposition to interracial relationships, for many of them are not idiots.
Just to make it clear once more: No can tell you who to date or who not to date, but accept that there are consequences and opposing feelings to absolutely everything we do in life, so don’t insult, incriminate and belittle men who won’t date you because they don’t like your ideology. You might be entirely convinced that you are right and they are wrong, but whether sexual race-mixing is right or wrong will always be subjective. No legitimate court could ever rule it as right or wrong, only as legal or illegal.
And that’s what you call trying to be rational, is it?
He used paragraphs.
it’s a start.
I’m just amused to note that I already said what I intended to say when I opened this thread (not realizing it was a zombie) years ago in the third post.
Don’t make such blanket statements. Yes, for many men this is indeed the case but for many it is also not. Simplifying such a complex phenomena to such an extreme extent will do more harm to society than what you might expect. We can’t have people losing their jobs or going to jail because irrational future race-based legislation officially considers it racist, evil and criminal for men/women to not approve of or not desire interracial dating… It could so easily happen. Imagine the ludicrous scenario in the future were men/women are required by law to like things they don’t like; to marry and date who they don’t want to because anti-racist laws have overruled the social liberty of freedom of choice in your personal life.
Crude statements like yours can make this a reality. Please think carefully about what you say. Not liking when white women date black men does NOT imply that the white man views black people as dogs. IF this becomes the common held view then horrific and tyrannical laws will be passed.
No one is trying to force anyone to date someone they don’t like or pass laws to that effect. That is a strawman argument that no one is making. I don’t even care if someone is or isn’t attracted to someone for whatever personal reason they have. However, I get to think someone is a racist and and a complete jerk if they believe sleeping with a black man ruins a white woman in some way.
These are examples of dog-stupid ideas:
These are examples of virulent, disgusting racist ideas:
Yeah, they really are.
When that “love and loyalty” extends to shunning an individual woman for being willing to “dedicate her womb to birthing” people of the wrong tribe, yes it does. It’s sick.