See…I don’t think so. I mean I’m fully cognizant that’s she’s had work done, but I guess because on her, it really looks “age-appropriate” I’m not willing to snark Joan VanArk & Barbara Eden could definitely have used a consult with whomever it is Sophia used.
I’m pleased to know that I’m not the only one who thinks that Jamie Lee Curtis is approximately 167% more attractive right now than she was when she was young. She really does look amazing.
And I’ll tolerate no negative remarks about Ms. Loren, either. Who cares what she’s had done? She had it done right, and she’s gorgeous.
They may have had work done but they also have sacrificed and worked their asses off to look like they do. That means that they exercised a lot and didn’t spend most of their adult life overeating. Obviously there are genetics involved and people with money can afford personal trainers and such which helps.
Would you have been willing to make the sacrifices in terms of diet and exercise in exchange for aging like those women?
The thing about Sophia Loren is that she has fantastic genes to work with. I’m seen pictures of her mother and she was absolutely stunning as well. There’s some picture floating around of them both at a cocktail party, looking like they’ve just had one of those sotto voce mum and daughter arguments that you have in public places - and they both look pissed off and have the same exquisite skin, hair and bone structure.
Obviously, I wasn’t, as it’s a fairly documented fact around here I’ve recently lost 152 pounds. And obviously, I know what is involved in looking like this at these ages - it was a tongue in cheek posting.