If there is a God - Meh.

[EvanS]

@Hoodoo Ulove

If that’s all you believe in you look like a goddamn atheist to me.

Now now, this is Great Debates, not the BBQ pit, please don’t call me names…

Now then, for clarification:

[ol]
[li]I can honestly debate that God may consist of the All, and that can consist of a definitionof God.[/li][li]Belief in God is another issue altogether, not requiring definitions.[/li][li]Isn’t a “goddamn athiest” a kind of oxymoron?[/li][li]What’s wrong with being an athiest, if I indeed was one?[/li][li]For the record, I believe in my experience only, and then only as my experience. For everything else I keep an open mind.[/li][/ol]

[Hoodoo_Ulove]

@EvanS

Now now, this is Great Debates, not the BBQ pit, please don’t call me names…

Now then, for clarification:

[ol]
[li]I can honestly debate that God may consist of the All, and that can consist of a definitionof God.[/li][li]Belief in God is another issue altogether, not requiring definitions.[/li][li]Isn’t a “goddamn athiest” a kind of oxymoron?[/li][li]What’s wrong with being an athiest, if I indeed was one?[/li][li]For the record, I believe in my experience only, and then only as my experience. For everything else I keep an open mind.[/li][/ol]

3. & 4. Calling you a “goddamn atheist” was a joke. I don’t consider it an insult.

4. Definitions are not of things, but of words. Thus, I agree that saying the definition of the word “God” is “the All” is a meaningful statement. It says nothing about anything but language, though.

5. I am at a loss as to how the question of belief in God can be addressed without definitions.

6. You’re drifting dangerously toward sollipsism here. Please be careful!

[Hoodoo_Ulove]

And no, “goddamn atheist” is not an oxymoron. Some might think it redundant, though.