[QUOTE=Leaffan]
What, no crows or pigeons or seagulls yet. Flying rodents.
[/QUOTE]
Who’s our member here, the stunningly handsome bird researcher from New Jersey who’s name starts with I think a “B”? She gonna come tousle your hair with some proper science!
I’d go with rats, damn the weaponized (re)percussions.
I still miss the guy-- I hope nobody’s gotten his ya.
For those of you who do not know what the hell I’m talking about-- the only poster I know who got banned for being stupid on purpose.
Oh wait! There was another! This other was banned for pretending to be stupid.
I think I’m with the few opting to eradicate humans (this act, of course, would take an unlikely moment of lack of sense of self preservation). We’re not terribly well balanced in terms of the ecosystem and if one species could go that would do the best for the most other species, well. The nasty viruses and such are nasty but part of a balanced setup in the big scheme of things-- only a problem in overpopulated groups-- but we humans tip the balances too much with our fancy big brains and opposable thumbs.
I’m a bit surprised nobody’s mentioned fireants yet. I guess most of you have never had to deal with 'em.
After living all of my life in Texas, one of the things I love most about living in the Pacific Northwest is being able to lay down on the lawn without having to worry about whether there’s a fireant nest within sight.
[QUOTE=Lightnin’]
After living all of my life in Texas, one of the things I love most about living in the Pacific Northwest is being able to lay down on the lawn without having to worry about whether there’s a fireant nest within sight.
[/QUOTE]
The absence of two inch long cockroaches is probably nice too.
[QUOTE=Athena]
This was my vote, after reading the malaria article in the latest National Geo. They said that some scientists estimate that 50% of all the humans in history have died of malaria, and that it’s by no means controlled in most of the world even now.
[/QUOTE]
I think wiping out mosquitoes would have too large a ripple effect on other species (birds who feed on them, and the like). My vote is for the Guinea worm. Nasty fuckers, those, and other species don’t depend on them to my knowledge.
[QUOTE=OneCentStamp]
Would the HIV virus count as a species? I just don’t see where it’s doing any good. Off with ye.
[/QUOTE]
It’s not snapping the fingers, but global monogamy would wipe out HIV in a single generation. Go ahead and have lots of sex, of any kind and any position with any gender, but just keep it within one partner.