We never had a honeymoon, so the question is rather academic for me.
I’d say, though, if I was ever in the situation - same place, that would be a no. A similar type of place but a different location? I would probably be okay with that.
Hmm the ex and I got married and had a three day honeymoon in Whistler. (Glacier skiing in July!) We were living in Vancouver, and only had about a dozen people at the wedding.
If I married the Beau we wouldn’t do that since we are halfway across the country from Whistler, he doesn’t ski, and it would mean importing his family and mine across the country. (Except my brother who oddly enough, lives in Whistler now.) The Beau and I would more likely have a big party here or in his hometown, because if we got married, it WOULD be for the party, because neither he nor I are particularly interested in making anything official after 4 years. Also, that’s what he does, organize shows and concerts, so a wedding would just be a better “show” for him with more flowers and less drunken underage screamo metal fans. (I hope!)
Nope. We went to Disney World, because he wanted to, and I wouldn’t do a honeymoon there if the choice were mine. Also, it’s my husband’s favorite place, so it would definitely be a reminder of him the whole time.
Given the choice, I’d go somewhere more romantic, or personal.
We didn’t have a honeymoon, but there is zero chance I would take wife #2 (assuming there ever is one) to the same location if there had been any such place.
Quoted for truth.