I think that describing Australia’s loss to Brazil as “hosed” isn’t very fair. They played well, took the game to the Brazilians on multiple occasions, and just about every commentator i’ve read or heard (all non-Australians) have praised the team for its performance against the world number 1.
Were the Aussies outclassed? Sure. There’s no denying that Brazil is in a different league when it comes to raw talent, teamwork, precision, and sheer footballing skill. But the Socceroos did as well as anyone expected, and probably better than most expected.
I, too, like Spain, and hope they move forward. I would like to see England do well, but they just haven’t shown many signs of inspiring football in this competition, and losing Michael Owen up front was quite a blow.
Yeah, i think the US team got well and truly shafted by the officiating in this competition. I’m not cynical enough to attribute it to some sort of anti-American prejudice; i just think they were unlucky enough to be playing in games where some awful decisions were made. The penalty that led to Ghana’s second goal was a joke.
This is true, too. I thought Ghana were the better team by a considerable margin for most of the game, and while they never should have got their second goal, they did deserve to win the game.
There was no excuse for the magnitude of the loss to the Czech Republic; the Americans just played awfully. Sure, the Czechs were expected to win anyway, but the US performance in that game set the tone for the rest of their World Cup.
They got unlucky again with officiating against Italy, with two red cards that constituted major over-reactions by the referee, IMO. Playing 9 against 10 doesn’t make for very good football.
Overall, too many of America’s star players (looking at you, Landon Donovan) didn’t show up in this competition.
The ESPN commentators certainly seem to agree with you. I don’t know enough about his tenure as coach to say one way or the other, and i never watch post-game press conferences (in any sport) because they’re always dull as dishwater and full of hackneyed cliches.
I’m not sure why the issue of bad officiating has to be some sort of nationalist one-upmanship (Oh yeah, you can’t complain, because your guy should have been sent off!).
As far as i’m concerned (and most Aussies i know feel the same way), poor officiating is bad whether it leads to a win or a loss for my team. No-one likes to have a victory soured by the thought that a bad refereeing call helped them win, and people like it even less when their team has to go home after being on the wrong end of bad calls. The best games are the ones where no-one even talks about the referee afterwards.
The only redeeming factor about the bad officiating in the last couple of games that i watched (US-Ghana; Australia-Croatia) is that, despite the poor refereeing, the best team got the right result on both occasions.