igotit...

:rolleyes:

Only an extremely stunted intellect would answer a question with something as ambiguous and childish as an emoticon. Are you saying…

“I can see you Waverly, you are above me [as is appropriate.]”
or
“The answer is written on the underside of my protruding brow, but I can’t quite make it out.”
or
“I don’t have a coherent response, please accept this smilie as a symbol of my acquiescence.”

So which is it? C’mon. Give me another smilie.

Dude, why are you getting your panties all in a bunch?
Are you obsessing over what somebody writes on a message board?
Because, you know, that’s pathetic, so I am told.

If you want to continue your little diatribe, go ahead, I have other stuff to do.

Chill dude.

Are we clear?

Have a nice day.

Oh, I almost forgot.
:slight_smile:

Hey - he is the jackass!

:rolleyes:

Esprix

I disagree. I believe emoticons are powerfully expressive symbols. For example:

:mad: :frowning: :o / :stuck_out_tongue:KK

:confused: :wally

Is far more elegant, expressive, and concise than “It angers and saddens me that I was never the recipient of oral sex or a salad tossing from our dear banned KayKay. I wonder if I she considered me unworthy?”
:smiley:

I don’t see people making sock-puppets to come back and bash any banned poster. If there were, I would agree with your summation. As there is not, I fail to see how your attempt at high-horsery has any merit.

I noticed igotit had been banned, didn’t recall seeing her do anything wrong. Did a search, found nothing. Assumed the mods had things well in hand. Noticed no mod had posted anything about it. Thought about it some more. Figured it out.

Guys, isn’t the point of banning trolls/socks NOT to call attention to them? Here’s an emoticon for you: :confused: Gee, what could I possibly mean by that?

Oh, and FTR

:rolleyes:

has perfectly obvious meaning to me. And it doesn’t involve a ‘stunted intellect.’ Here’s another one: :rolleyes:

Agreed; that was some wonderfully communicative emoti-phrasing.

Oh, see everyone’s favorite distilled spirit has offered his weighty opinion. I think I am changing my mind to his way of thinking… errr… wait… no. It was just acid reflux. Or in terms the textually challenged can understand:
:wally

I noticed that igotit had been banned, as well… my first thought was perhaps she had been baneed for posting all the stuff about anal sex. It was not until I read these posts that I realized that she might have been trying to return under a different name. In either case, banning her was something that had to be done, IMHO. (especially after she was told to cool down on the subject matter) I thought of doing a search, but thought it wouldn’t really acheive anything.

Oh, and I read her name as “I-got-it”… whatever the “it” was is best left to conjecture.

Holy stunted intellect, Batman! Gee, Waverly, that’s a real sparkling show of wit, there. It was so funny I forgot to laugh. No, no, really, you changed my mind with your weighty opinion. Fuck off.

I was about to post that, literally word for word. I was even going to italicize “is”. Wierd.
(Er, word for word except signing it “Esprix,” of course.)

snort
[sub]me too[/sub]

This thread is closed.

your humble TubaDiva
Administrator