I know ask why poster x was banned is cliche, and bad form, yada yada, but I’m curious- and hope that I and others might learn from her mistake. Maybe it was something I missed while away, or I didn’t see it this past week. Or perhaps she was banned under a previous incarnation.
Forgive my inquery, but I could stand the need to know no longer.
She did kkind of remind me of a certain poster that went missing while I was unable to post. Thanks for affirming my suspiscions. Any relevant keywords to search on to get the scoop?
Poor K.
For all her anal-sexing and deepthroating, she seems to have a surprisingly empty life. To obsesses over a message board to this extent is pathetic-sad in a Tammy Faye, Bill Carteresque kind of fashion.
Was she banned as KayKay? I don’t remember her being banned. I think Igotit even mentioned when she started that she was previously under a different name but the name was lost in the board crash.
That said I am curious what the bannible (sp?) offense was.
Maybe because I had a feeling it might have been her and considering her posting style and general subject matter, “Ego Tit” would have been a bit more apropos.
Otherwise wouldn’t it have been “Igiveit” “Repeatedly”? “Andcan’tstoptalkingaboutit”?
Oh - sorry - one last thing, pezpunk I believe she was banned back when she had been told to “cool it” with the posting subject matter, then, after saying she would, deliberately and admittedly started a thread in MSPIMS or IMHO abou the same old thing and admitted she did it to see what would happen. I believe that’s when the “don’t be a jerk” rule came around and bit her big time.
I am given to understand that this was not the first time that this individual attempted to return under another name, so her victim act is a bit disingenuous.
Since you chose to paraphrase my words in your little mini-rant, allow me to respond.
Commenting on the circumstances of a banned poster is quite common, and there is nothing unusual going on here. If a moderator wishes to comment or close the thread, I’m sure they will make that decision on their own, and they don’t need imthjckaz wielding pseud-power on their behalf.
Whatever anyone else’s feelings or comments, my specific words are both fair and accurate. Chronically returning socks are pathetic and sad, and it is ironic that this particular sock-a-lot goes to great lengths to titillate while the mere act of socking betrays a more mundane existence.
If one did not want to be discussed while not being present to provide their own side of the story, one should not return when they know they are no longer welcome.