I love this, it makes me feel so normal. I’ve had an interest in typographical design for years, and I totally understand the technical and aesthetic complaints.
D’oh! I just realized I completely missed the point of the article. IKEA is changing its standard typeface to Verdana, a non-serif font. They apparently won’t be making any changes to their logo.
I confess - the whole post was an excuse for me to use superfluous umlauts anyway, so I didn’t even really skim the article to begin with. Because I lööövës me some umlauts.
And I still think “take a Hiekänd Göfuk Ürselff” works in the corrected context.
I noticed and didn’t like it. Verdana just doesn’t work with IKEA’s catalogue. It looks so cheap and like someone slapped it together in Adobe Pagemaker with whatever ready-loaded sans serif font they had.
Part of the problem with using Verdana for print is that it was developed for use on screen. It’s optimized to be readable when rendered in pixels; those sorts of typefaces aren’t the best choice for printed text. There are a billion print typefaces to choose from – why in heaven’s name did they choose a screen font, and a Microsoft screen font at that? sheesh