I strongly feel that humans are superior to electronic devices. (Not all humans, of course, but in general. I certainly am.)
What kind of bigotry is that? I’ve heard “carbonist” to describe people who feel carbon-based life forms are superior to other life forms, but I wouldn’t call electronic devices a “life form”. “Humanist” has a different meaning.
I am stumped for a term. Help me out. Thx.
You’re a biologist!
No, wait…
biophile?
Biophilic?
Mysdroidist?
Meatbag.
I think I’d go with “sane.” It’s the people who believe humans are inferior to electronics you need to worry about.
Hey, baby, want to kill all humans? 
Some form of luddite?
A Machinist.
Philosapienist?
Philohomo? That can’t be right.
Misandroid, as opposed to a Misanthrope
Human Firster
Unassimilated
Sentientist.
Bene Gesserit
A Bio-Supremacist.
Ooo - I like this one.
Let’s clarify:
Do you mean that you consider human beings to be superior to all currently existing electronic devices?
Or do you mean that, in an Asimovian* world of sentient robots, you’d consider the organic humans to be superior to the robots, no matter how smart or skillful they got?
Or do you mean that you believe that there never can or will be electronic devices that rival human beings (human-like robots; computers that could pass a Turing test, etc.)?
*not the Doper
Definitely “yes” to #1 and #3. If I am wrong about #3 and we eventually produce actual sentient robots (#2), then I will reevaluate my bigotry. (If they have soft lips and skillful hands, they may actually be superior to men.)
This is my winner so far…
Beep boop beep.
Hmm… Who is the love child of Betty Boop and the Road Runner?
[Alex Trebek]
Correct for a thousand; and tdn, you’re in control of the board. Select another category.
[/Alex Trebek]
Sorry, couldn’t resist. 