Sure, it’s easy. It is a very special kind of blindness you need, having to be is blind to your own faults and possess a limitless capacity for self forgiveness. Sound like a big ask? Look around. Think again. It’s everywhere.
To reiterate, terrorism is merely what people too poor for an army do. For instance consider: Which is the greater crime:
indiscriminate civilian deaths from homemade explosives; or
I haven’t read the whole thread, but I’d like to mention that there’s a very good article about the shooter in our local alternative rag this week. They interviewed his roommate.
I see js_africanus has done what I wanted to do, but more eloquently. I just want to add, re buttonjockey’s list: it’s disingenuous to include London, Madrid and Beirut in your list of the threat to “us”, while comparing Islamists only with the short list of non-Muslim terrorists who have attacked targets on US soil.
If you choose to include those cities (and non-US hijackings, etc.), then you’ll need to add the names of all the non-Muslim terrorists who have acted in them - and then that list will run into the hundreds or thousands and diminish your point.
By all means use the list to bolster your point, which is not without merit, but miss out non-US incidents when you’re attempting to show the exclusive threat from Islamism. (Oh, and the bomb Marine Barracks in Beirut, while reprehensible, doesn’t really fall under “terrorism” by most people’s definition, since it was a military target.)
The fact is that while this fellow’s illness and extremist actions are all his own, to my mind at least the true subject of the discussion ought to be “is there a real problem, or danger, of Islamic extremism leading to actual danger to the public here in North America?”
With a side order of this debate: “is even raising this subject an example of bigotry or the operation of some sort of logical fallacy, such as selective screening of facts?”
A few years ago I would have thought the answer to the first question was “no” and the answer to the second question was “probably”. After 9/11, I feared that the real danger to the public was the possibility of a backlash of bigotry against Muslims, both here and in the US.
Now, I’ve changed my mind. I believe this change of mind is based on facts and not bigotry. You be the judge.
It seems to me that increasingly “extremist positions” among the Muslim community here in my city have become, if not the norm, at least more accepted; that liberal Muslims are being hounded out of their own communities (see link provided above); that terrorist cells have started to form (one of which was famously busted just a little while ago, and while they haven’t been tried yet, the evidence against them seems pretty solid).
I can dismiss this guy as a lone nutcase. It is however the overall pattern or trend, which may or may not have influenced this nut, which is disturbing. Particularly in my city as my city, Toronto, rightly prides itself on its multiculturalism.
That really pisses me off too. The Israeli govenment is continually equating Judaism with Israel. And this pathetic argument is often used on this board … if you are against Israel you must be anti-semetic. Israel insisting it is acting for jewish people leads to morons like this bozo in Seattle think that they are fighting Israel in some way by hurting/killing innocent people.
Just because Israel is bad, this does not mean jews are bad. Zionism != Judaism.
I’m willing to accept that the Muslim community should not be held in any way morally responsible for this lunatic’s lunacy; you seem to be edging close to arguing that Israel should be.
When I wrote the OP, many of the “facts of the case” were not yet in the open.
Now, in retrospect, it’s clear that the guy is a loon.
Notwithstanding that, I still feel that it’s remarkable that he chose to act out his lunacy in a way that targeted Jews. I think it is distinctly possible that happened as a consequence of the hateful environment he was exposed to - an environment all too commonly fostered by various extremist Islamic elements in North America and abroad.
Thats right. Below is just one example of how Israel is equating its actions with Jewish morality. Obviously this does not put Jewish morality in good light. Many people around the world hear this connection, which results in disturbing actions from mentaly unstable Seatilites to drunk American actors.
Well then again I and other posters would have to ask you to point to available evidence and not your assumptions about what has caused his behavior.
Apparently it wasn’t his parents:
"The parents of a Muslim man accused of shooting to death a woman and injuring five other people at a Jewish nonprofit organization last week wrote letters to Jewish groups on Monday saying “they don’t want this to be seen as anything but the act of an ill person,” a lawyer for the family said.
“It’s basically telling the people that they’re very sorry for the tragedy that happened, that they’re praying for them,” said the lawyer, Larry C. Stephenson. “They don’t want this to be seen as creating any hatred between Jewish and Muslim people. The Haqs are very religious people.”"
Frankly, I might as well start asking you to justify this, “seeming rise in violence among white middle-aged nut-jobs against a random sampling of society,” in relation to the serial killers just arrested Phoenix, Arizona.
No, it indicates that I was under the impression that these posts were on the SDMB GD forum and thus if someone makes an assertion, it’s on them to back it up. YMMV. (BTW, do you want a reminder of that term also?)
If you exchange Toronto with Amsterdam, I could have written this.
What bothers me most is that people dismiss you as a bigot, when you’re merely questioning a religion/doctrine.