“Come on now, time to go to bed.”
“Why, Mommy?”
“Because it’s bedtime.”
“Whyyy?”
“Because you have to be rested for your day tomorrow.”
“Whyyyyyy?”
“Because if you don’t get enough sleep, you’ll be cranky.”
“But whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?”
“Because I SAID SO, okay? Now stop whining and go to BED, Stoid… you’re in your FORTIES for Christ’s sake!”
You don’t understand the internet, I see.
That answer is 100% more reasonable and meaningful than the answer I actually did get. Hello. Forget the whole thread, try reading the OP.
The reason you need to remind yourself because you made it up yourself. It’s not my job to maintain your story about who I am.
That you find me so is clear. That you, and others, take the time to read my threads and then craft these penetrating observations to share publicly says nothing at all about me but rather a lot about you, and that you are oblivious to that continues to surprise me.( Given how precious and finite time is for all of us, I’d kinda have to be flattered if it actually did have anything to do with me.)
I always find myself wanting to challenge you and my other rabid fans to point to my actual words (it’s the only truth you have, after all) to demonstrate the legitimacy of your foam-flecked declarations about who I am…but then I have to remind myself that the truth just sucks all the fun out of it so why would you spend your precious and finite time on it? You wouldn’t…that’s just the optimism someone else mentioned, I guess. (Or maybe just short term memory loss.)
That is for damn sure! Hell, I don’t understand most of the things I use every day: my car, microwave, telephones…wow. When you think about what the average human being accomplishes in a day using tools we mostly do not fathom in the slightest, vs. what our ancestors accomplished using tools they understood thoroughly, it’s hard to believe we’re even the same species!
Your pain is palpable. I’m sorry about that and I lack the tools to ease it except to do what I’ve inadvertently already done, which is to give you something to bite on.
You’re welcome.
[hijacky kinda of my own thread]
FYI for the fans: I’ve been reviewing the transcripts as I prepare my brief and the judge, who is absolutely not happy with me, still gave me a real acknowledgement in the same breath she was telling me I blew it…but the fact she said it at all was nice, and nice to hear from a legal professional who isn’t on my side at all. (Although the fact that I have so little respect for her does devalue it a little…)
During a sort of “dueling ex partes” session between me and the receiver who was still trying to evict me from my own home, with absolutely no legal authority or right of any kind whatsoever, which is what I was trying to get the judge to see, she said this:
(Bleh…reporter’s transcripts are in some weird all caps ASCII format that drives me crazy, that’s why the all caps)
I have always fumbled around the whole ex parte process, which I think of as “Here’s my zippy request for you to hear my request zippily!”
And, for those keeping score: it took 9 months, two ex parte hearings, two completely separate actions filed by the receiver, a separate action filed by me, a judicial disqualification, and a whole trial, but finally, in the last version of the most recent judgment, after spending a whole page describing exactly the ways in which the receiver could ask for contempt if I was a pain about selling the house, she gave me what I was fighting for not only for me, but really for all the other people the receiver has screwed or would try to screw later, in the following simple sentence:
“While Defendant remains a tenant in common in the property unlawful detainer is not the proper remedy.” and a cite to one of the many cases I had cited to her many months before.
If she’d been speaking aloud it would have been mumbled under her breath.
It’s certainly possible that I’m crazy. But I’m not wrong.
– bolding mine.
Which is Dawkins point and not the strawman you wish to assign him.
Which doesn’t justify using a term like “Jewish lobby” was my point.
Fair enough for accuracy’s sake. However I think you’d find some very good arguments against the points raised by the blogger you cited in his very page – just scroll down some.
Your attention to the underscored section suggests a jilted lover who focuses solely on the “you’re a really great person” bit of a kiss-off letter, while willfully ignoring the “…but we don’t have anything in common and I don’t ever, EVER want to see you again” portion.
…people…
You’d have a point…except that I was right, and if i’d reacted the way you think I should have, the way most people would have, actually, I’d have been put on the street a year ago. But I’m still in my home and I’m very likely going to remain here for years to come.
This isn’t about being technically perfect, it’s about fighting for what’s genuinely important and for what’s right in the ways that matter. It’s about what’s referred to as “the merits”. In this instance she was complaining because I hadn’t been careful enough with my frame…my picture was dead on.
That’s what’s so funny about the grief I’ve gotten around this stuff - it’s really not about whether I’m right or wrong, it’s about the fact that 99% of people would have given up long ago, and I didn’t, and that is irritating as hell to a certain segment of people.
The UD thing is an excellent demonstration of why I didn’t, and why I’m incredibly glad I didn’t, and why there’s no reason I should have…except that it’s what was expected, even by my supporters, who are proud and happy and impressed as hell by me. And my detractors and opponents are ready to throttle me for the same things that impress those who support me… .I was supposed to give up when I ran out of money to pay lawyers, dammit! That’s what everyone does! What the fuck was I doing, fighting on? Didn’t I know that the person who can pay the biggest, baddest lawyers for the longest time is supposed to win?
Oh well!
I understand them very well, I just think they’re kinda ridiculous a lot of the time, so I don’t pay much attention to whatever they’re acting out about.
Yeah, that’s it exactly. :rolleyes:
Having followed this with some amusement I can assure you, it seems abundantly clear that you’re a thick and daft bitch with delusions of importance and cleverness. And that “99%” of the criticism you’re catching is because it is painfully obvious you’re an idiot.
Did you notice that the poor judge is saying exactly what all the lawyers were saying in both the threads about your legal woes?
Regards,
Shodan (who knows perfectly well you didn’t notice, and never will)
What I noticed, assuming those where the judge’s exact words, is that the judge was pretty confusing herself. Pot - kettle, in other words.
Sure. They are just jealous.
I get the feeling that Stoid’s mother did a bit too good a job of telling her she was the prettiest pony in the park.
I didn’t see that. It read very much like a transcript often does. Without the voice inflections and context, it is harder to read that something written de novo.
So Stoid requests something legally incomprehensible or other, and the judge responds -
IOW, “file your order and maybe I can figure out what the heck you are talking about. You know the terminology but not the law.” As Vinyl Turnip points out, the only part Stoid was listening to is the part she wanted to hear. The part where the judge told her that she does not know what she is talking about - no doubt for the umpteenth time - passed over Stoid’s head like a seagull.
Regards,
Shodan