In order to be called a lawyer in OH...

…you need to pass the bar right?

I thought so. I asked this question in this thread, but apparently that’s not enough. I need an Ohio specific statement that clearly states that one is not a lawyer in the state of Ohio if one has not passed the bar, if in fact that is the law. (I’m sure it is.)

My searches only come up with OH AG Jim Petro sites that are of no use, and other laws and regulations that are not specific to OH.

I’d really love to bury this hatchet. Please help. Thanks.

Ohio lawyers are regulated by the Ohio Supreme Court. The rules for who may practice law in Ohio are referenced here (see Section 2).

FYI, I found this information by googling “Ohio bar association,” where I learned from a FAQ that the bar association in OH is voluntary, and that licensing is handled by the Supreme Court.

Great resource, but it doesn’t give me a concrete definition of what constitutes a “lawyer” in the state of Ohio.

Dictionarys say that a lawyer is one whose profession is practicing law, which means that one needs to be licensed in order to call oneself a lawyer, this is enough for me. I’d love to have a section of legalese that states such in very few, concise words though.

Maybe I’m reaching at straws here, I know I’m right, I just need an exemplar that proves my point.

If having a JD makes you a lawyer, show me the proof. If calling oneself a lawyer takes more than just a JD, please prove that to me.

The rules have to be out there, I just can’t find 'em.

Seems to me like ENugent’s cite is dead on. Here:

A lawyer is someone who practices law. To practice law in the State of Ohio (as listed in this code) you must:

  • be 21
  • have a bachelor’s degree
  • get your JD or LLB
  • pass your moral character application
  • pass the Ohio Bar and the Multistate (or waive in)
  • get sworn in

If you haven’t done all of these things, you’re not a lawyer in Ohio. Please note that passing the bar (or waiving in) is a requirement.

  • Peter Wiggen

Also - if you’re just trying to prove a point - like telling some drinking buddy with a JD that he/she’s not a lawyer, then it’s even easier.

Go to the the Supreme Court of Ohio’s website. Click on attorney directory. Type in their name.

If it comes up - they’re a lawyer. If not, well.

  • Peter Wiggen

Actually, Peter, what you are saying is technically not correct.

A lawyer is someone who is a practicioner of law. You can be a lawyer in Ohio without being admitted to the Ohio bar. For example, you might be practicing in federal court only, without having attempted to obtain permission from the Ohio Supreme Court to practice in the courts of the state.

You might also be practicing in Michigan, living in Ohio.

You might also be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.

Anyone can say they are a lawyer, though there are attendant risks from doing so without authorization to practice the law.

By contrast, if you are admitted to practice before the courts of the State of Ohio by the Supreme Court of that state, you are an “attorney at law.” You are an official officer of the Ohio court system, and have the authorization to practice before the courts legally. You can engage in all the functions of a lawyer, such as giving advice, representing in court, etc.

So, by example, I am a lawyer, and I live in Ohio. I am not an attorney in Ohio, because I’m not admitted to the bar here. I am an attorney in California where I am admitted to the bar.

I’m not certain exactly what the OP wants to “prove.” If the point is to prove you can’t practice law in Ohio without permission from the Ohio Supreme Court, that is true, with the caveat that you can practice before the federal courts here without Ohio’s permission. However, to get federal permission, you have to have obtained the permission of SOME state at some point in time; I was sworn to practice before the federal courts in California at the same proceding where I was sworn in to practice before California’s courts. If I wanted the federal districts in Ohio to allow me to practice, I’d have to ask them for permission to do so.

It should be noted that you don’t have to pass the bar exam in Ohio to become admitted. If you are admitted in another state, if you have been actively practicing law for 5 out of the last 10 years, and if you have a relatively clean record, you can petition the Supreme Court here for permission to practice without taking the exam. It forces you to undergo the same background check as if you were taking the exam, and it does require that you have been admitted in another state, and I’m not sure there are any states any more that don’t have some flavor of bar exam.

Hope that helps someone.

Use of the term “lawyer” by someone not licensed as described above is prohibited by this Ohio statute:

(Emphasis added.)

http://onlinedocs.andersonpublishing.com/oh/lpExt.dll/PORC/20e65/21016/2103e?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0#

Most states have a similar statute hidden away in their statutes.

Actually, you can get admitted in the Northern District as a member of *any *state bar. In the Southern District, you have to admitted to practice law in Ohio, *and *pass an exam.

See Local Rules, Southern District Rule 83.3(pdf)

Another Ohio statute on attorney admission and practice of law.

http://onlinedocs.andersonpublishing.com/oh/lpExt.dll/PORC/20e65/21016/21018?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0#

I did not know that. I did the same thing in Vegas, actually. Ran a law office. Managed cases. Drafted documents. But didn’t give clients advice, appear in court, or sign anything. When I had contact with other lawyers on Nevada matters, I was very careful to explain that I was acting as a legal assistant (even though I was licensed in two other states) and that if they wanted to talk about the merits of the case, I would have the lawyer call them back. They usually wanted to discuss the case with me anyway, but I would decline.

No provision for admission pro hac vice?

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/0/2001/2001-Ohio-1303.pdf (pdf) (pro hac vice allowed as long as it is an “isolated occurrence” of limited duration) citing Gov.Bar R. I(9)(H) (“This Division does not apply to participation by an attorney not yet admitted to practice in Ohio in a cause being litigated in the State when such participation is with leave of the judge hearing such cause.”)