First question: 1600’s religious movement that still has a few practitioners (OK, that’s more than three or four words, but you get the idea).
Second question: I think the Quakers acknowledge the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth (or something), but aren’t exactly Christians in the strictest sense. That’s based on memory and not on Googling.
for the first millisecond: a flash in my mind of a silly image: 17th century folks dressed like the Amish do today, and calling each other “thee” and “Thou”.
after 2 seconds of rational thought: nonviolent, conscientious objectors to military draft, stood bravely and effectively against slavery 150 years ago, but nowadays seem to have disappeared.
sort of like Unitarians. You know, the good-deed,don’t-get-too-specific kind of Christians
I was raised in the Friends church, and I’m constantly amazed by how many people have such inaccurate ideas about Quakers, like the ones already posted above.
Go to a Friends service and you’ll find it quite similar to any other mainstream protestant denomination, with the exception of fewer physical symbols. You’ll even see the same sort of differences depending on location: A church in a small rural town may have a congregation that skews older and seems more old-fashioned while one in a city may have more younger members and a pastor who plays bass in a jazz combo. (Yes, I do know a Friends pastor who plays upright bass in jazz combo. He also sometimes plays it in church services.) I even know a Quaker who played bass in a bar band for a number of years. He’s here in the room I’m in, and I’m the only one here.
If you want to look at some of the specifics, part one of Faith & Practice is a good place to start.
Each Yearly Meeting has its own Faith & Practice, but they are pretty similar:
I think you’re confusing the Quakers with the Shakers, here…the Quakers aren’t exactly in danger of taking over the world, but they’re not in danger of dying out, either (at least not in Africa or North America), whereas the Shakers are down to a few dozen, worldwide.
Oats. Sorry, but it’s honestly the first thing I think of. Obviously, I know that’s not what you meant. For religion, I tend to think “Christian” with a vague idea of pacifism and anti-slavery views, historically.
For a year, I actually attended a Quaker congregation so I don’t feel too bad about my mental associations. I even took a weekly class that delved into the history. I learned a lot about the faith.
The people were really nice and friendly. My local congregation is very crunchy granola liberal, which is fine with me. But also very very very white, and I felt kind of fake trying to blend in.
I grew up in a Pentacostal church, the opposite extreme. While I don’t dig watching people fall out in the aisles shouting gibberish, sitting in silence of an hour was uncomfortable for me. While sitting there, I would always think to myself that I could be doing the same thing in the comfort of my bedroom, in my pajamas. Yes, sometimes people had interesting testimonies. But they did not occur frequently enough to take away the awkwardness
My stint with Quakerism was my last ditch attempt to find a connection to Christianity. I didn’t really want to admit to myself that I no longer had any belief in Jesus. But when the Quaker stuff failed to stick with me, I knew I had to.
Quakers were sober, illustrious people who became capitalists with a christian social conscience. Many large UK companies had quaker foundations, and worked hard to bring about social change. Cadburys built an entire suburb of Birmingham to house their workers, with the proviso that there were no public houses.
Quakers built free schools and hospitals and pushed for rules against child labour, in addition to campaigning against slavery.
We owe them a great deal.