I do get a kick out of the variety of schools that have made a Quaker their mascot, often using the moniker ‘Fighting Quakers’. It’s like having a team out there called the ‘Impolite Canadians’.
I honestly wasn’t aware there was a difference. I don’t really pay much attention to such things.
I suppose they’d have a very strong defense. . .
As soon as I saw the thread title, I immediately associated the word ‘Quaker’ with “meeting for worship”. I was not raised in the Friends Society, but I attended a Friends School from 6th grade through HS graduation…
I am now picturing Richard Nixon sporting an Amish beard while saying, “I am not a crook.”
Peace-nik, Nixon.
<website removed> Just now it is an important time of year for us. Saturday March 31 2018 all over the world nine million Jehovah’s Witnesses will commemorate the death of Jesus Christ. <website removed>
naguere, the forum for witnessing is Great Debates. This thread is not about that religion or about trying to promote any particular religion. Thanks.
First the oats, of course. But, from there, it’s just “old-timey, US colonial era Christian, ala pilgrims.” I also think of the word “Friends.” I’m not sure why I would not think of them as Christian.
I’m vaguely aware that they still exist, but it’s not something I’ve looked into, or know what makes them different. After reading the thread, I remember their pacifism, but that’s it.
My son attended a Friends school from grades 7 through 12. Their athletic teams’ cheer was
Fight, fight, inner light!
Kill, Quakers, kill!
It raised eyebrows among the competing teams at cross country meets, I will assure you.
As for the OP; in 3-4 words: Member, Society of Friends. Which I don’t suppose is especially helpful. Here, in the Northeast-but-not-Philadelphia, it means “outsider-ish religious group whose members are politically very very liberal and work very very hard for peace and tend to be white and well off and well educated and pontificate a lot.”
I do have a lot of respect for what the Friends do both today and in the past. The ones I’ve met, some but by no means all through the school (actually the school had very few Quakers among the faculty or student body), are, well, friendly, and thoughtful, and committed to what they do in a way that I find admirable.
And I like the emphasis on simplicity. I have attended an Epsicopal church throughout my adult life, and there are many wonderful things about it…but the emphasis on Pomp and Circumstance gets very tiring for me after a while: processions and vestments and stained glass windows and organ music and there just isn’t much room left over for that “still small voice of calm.”
So I have visited Sunday Friends services (apart from the school), and I appreciate the no-robes, bare-bones room, listen for the spirit ethos.
But it sometimes seems like when people speak up they all too often deliver entire academic papers… So it doesn’t quite do it for me either. Oh well!