In Which Eve is Baffled by a "Proverb"

So, I am doing the subtle “peering at what your neighbor’s reading” maneuver on the subway last night. This woman had a Book of Biblical Proverbs on her lap, and I started looking at it.

I saw one which began, “Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth . . .” and I thought, “Oh, well, that’s nice, although I seriously doubt I could live up to that.” Then I caught the rest of the Proverb: " . . . Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him."

What the huh? Doesn’t this mean, “Don’t let God know how happy you are that your enemy is miserable, or God will stop torturing him for your pleasure?” What the hell kind of Proverb is that?!

It’s the kind of Proverb that’s common in the Old Testament.

You know, like “Be nice to those that hate you… because it’ll drive them nuts.”

Or the ones about God smashing your enemies and causing them to vanish like “wax before the fire” (obviously anticipating the end scene of Indiana Jones and the Lost Ark.)

Think all but the most ardent biblical literalist would admit that, certainly in the Old Testament, what was handed down orally to ultimately end up in the Bible was sometimes how people wanted God to be like.

Many theists here would not recognise their God in that verse.

Wow, I had no idea the Bible could be so mean-spirited! Maybe I’ve been underestimating it all these years . . .

It’s Proverbs 24:17-18 if anyone wants to look up the passage.

Your interpretation is pretty close, although there is no indication that God is torturing your enemies for your entertainment. The proverb is in the middle of several passages describing the bad things that are going to happen to bad people.

As far as I can tell, the proverb is warning us against gloating over our enemies’ downfall. Doing this is a usurpation of God’s role as Judge. The danger is that God may withdraw His judgement of the wicked, and leave it all up to you. It is sort of a variant of “Be careful what you wish for”.

Or you can interpret it in a practical way, as a warning “Don’t kick a man when he is down, because he might get up. And if he does, don’t expect God to save you.”

Regards,
Shodan

So, it’s kind of a “karma is a pisser” proverb?

I think Shodan is a little closer to the truth. Actually it strikes me as suggesting that if you gloat over someone’s misfortune, you’ll get a taste of teh same medicine.

Pretty much. Also an advisement that The Lord’s Wrath™ is not for your entertainment, but should inspire Awe and a good helping of Fear and even some sadness that this guy got himself in a position to come to such a bad end, not, as Shodan said, gloating.

Except that it doesn’t really say anything about God’s wrath falling on you.

Another, less bloodthirsty interpretation is as follows:

Don’t assume that misfortune means that a man has called down the wrath of the Lord, for the ending of that misfortune would prove you wrong.

It’s almost as good as Psalm 18:32-49:

God is a good guy to have around in a knife fight.

“As far as I can tell, the proverb is warning us against gloating over our enemies’ downfall. Doing this is a usurpation of God’s role as Judge.”

The old spoil-sport.

Jesus was an avid student of the OT, I can imagine that he derived his “love thy enemies” and “don’t worry about what is in someone else’s eye” from this and other parts fo the OT.

I am not knocking Eve since this particular passage is somewhat confusing. However, I’d like to take this opportunity to express my dismay at the completely negative view many people have of the OT.

I honestly don’t see what the problem is.

This is the Jewsih God we’re talking about - not the Christian one. He can be merciful, it’s just not policy.

I think Abraham Lincoln said something like ‘God is always on the side of right, lets just hope our nation is on God’s side.’

And God’s mercy is shown throughout the Old Testament. How many years did it take Noah to build an ark? During that time, as it had never rained, do you not think people asked about it, and were told what God had said? Would God have not destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for the sake of just ten righteous people? Was the ‘scape goat’ showing mercy for sins, where judgment was warranted? Didn’t the prophets warn of the blessings and curses of obedience vs. disobedience?

Read the proverb Eve gave again, then read the responses. Are the responses to the proverb, or to what the theists assume is the objection?

Svt4Him says those killed by the flood were warned (even the babies? No matter.) But the proverb is not talking about punishment for the wicked, but about god not punishing your enemy if you gloat. Alessan talks about that mighty morphin god, unchangeable except if the OT god gets embarrassing. I could have sworn that someone told me Christians were monotheists - my mistake.

Kniz talks about love thy enemies. I didn’t realize that came from love thy enemies, or else god may not punish them. I guess I don’t understand the NT very well.

RickJay talks about getting the same medicine. Where that came from, I don’t know, unless your enemy not getting punished is considered as punishment. (I can see that in the OT).

And Shodan says that it might mean that God will withhold punishment of the wicked and leave it to us. Well, I can see that as a reasonable interpretation of this verse - however I thought the whole hell thing was because god didn’t have any choice about punishing sinners. Does this mean we can save people by sneering at them?

I’ve got a little experiment - let’s start rejoicing at people getting cancer and AIDS, and maybe God will cure them just to spite us.

You’ll love the Old Testament, then. :wink:

I’m Jewish. As far as I’m concerned, the God of the Tanach is the only God in the game.

The quote form the OP, BTW, was written 500 years - at least - before the birth of Christ and has nothing to do with Christianity.

Ah - I’ve heard so many Chrisians make this point without irony that I was fooled. I’m Jewish also, and I’m with you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

How many years did it take Noah to build an ark?

I imagine his sons helped, too.

Anyhow, the off-the-cuff answer you will get is 120 years, but anyone who has bothered to read Genesis will see that 120 years is waaaaaaay too long.

Noah was 500 before his 3 sons were born. When God commanded Noah to build the ark, his sons were already married (unless God was speaking prophetically about his daughter-in-law’s going along for the ride when He told Noah to build it), so chances are they weren’t kids. He was 600 when the flood hit, so if you figure the average age at marriage for a man was, oh, 35ish (just a guess), it probably took them oh, 50-65 years to build it.

Or maybe they just threw that sucker up in a coupla years. Doubtful, though. That thing was huge and it had to be made out of a certain kind of wood, which probably involved a lot of tree chopping.

Or maybe when the guy was telling the story for the first time some kid at the campfire asked, “So uh, how old was Noah, and how long did it take to build this ark” and he replied, “Uh, I don’t know, like 500 or something, and it took like 100 years to build the ark, it was big after all, of course it only took a few months for all the animals/provisions to get on, nevermind all those ones on the two continents we haven’t even discovered yet, or the BILLIONS of insect species…or…ad infinitum”

Glad this thing was in GD. I just couldn’t resist smarting off.