Not a parents place to limit their children’s self-discovery and self-expression? Have you been smoking crack? Or have you been letting your kids smoke crack? After all, how else are they going to explore the wide world of crack-whoring unless they start smoking? This has got to be the most idiotic statement I have seen posted recently.
Zabali_Clawbane, I do not know you, and I agree that you must let your kids make mistakes and discover things for themselves, but your statement, which includes no limits on said activities, is just plain dangerous. Maybe you just forgot the statement of limitations, in which case I applogize in advance (But you should have included it in your post). However, from the gist of your post I do not think you would agree to any limits (Please, please correct me). These are the parents that I see having beer-bust for their children and letting them smoke pot. Do what you want after 18, but it is your job to socialize them and let them reach the point they can make good decisions, and equip them to make good decisions.
Do you wonder why so many people have problems with kids acting up at the movies?
Did you actually read Zabali’s responses in that same thread? She said there were limitations on that self-expression based upon the health and safety of the child. Wearing a dress and smoking crack are two rather different things. Dresses are not, to my knowledge, addictive and dangerous substances. I know of no one who could OD and die of dresses and, trust me, if one could we’d know by now. So how’s about you post the entire context before calling Zabali a bad parent?
Are we now supposed to list everything that our posts aren’t meant to endorse?
This post does not endorse:
[ul][li]killing puppies[/li][li]Republicans[/li][li]having sex with minors[/li][li]smoking crack[/li][li]orange Tic-Tacs[/li][li]inferring vastly different subjects into any of Zabali_Clawbane’s posts regarding wearing dresses[/ul][/li]
Do you see where this is going?
OK, I have read the entire thing and see that Zabali_Clawbane later effectively withdrew her previous call for total freedom of childhood self-expression and self-discovery.
However, I do not think any poster or reader should be appalled that someone is taken at their word in a posting. She clearly stated that she believed it was not a parents place to limit their children’s self-expression and self-discovery. I do not see it is my job to track down every post someone has made to ensure they do not later change their mind.
Also, if you bothered to read MY post, you will note the following statement:
What? She clearly stated in a paragraph regarding a child wearing a dress to not limit a child’s self-expression. It doesn’t take a master’s degree to figure out she was talking about, wait for it, a child wearing a dress! Where the hell you got “smoking crack” out of that paragraph, only you and your shrink will know.
What fucking “statement of limitations”?!? If I say that I like driving cars, people don’t get up in arms that I’ve expressed a desire to go on a driving rampage, running over everyone walking on the sidewalk. There’s no need to come up with a statement of limitations on what my driving enjoyment entails or excludes. In no way should Zabali_Clawbane be expected to do the same.
Wait, you started up a Pit thread against a SDMB poster regarding one paragraph that person made in a thread you didn’t completely read? And that one paragraph has absolutely nothing to do with what you’re pissed about? Jackass.
You incredible pervert! Do you mean to tell me that you have nothing against sex with poultry? I apologize in advance if I misunderstand you, you disgusting trash.
Even the part you posted limited the “total freedom” you claim Z_C “called for”.
Maybe, while you’re busy taking people at their words, you could figure out what their words actually are.
See, I would kinda assume that “being honorable” to others would include not being a total asshole in a crowded movie theatre. Or, another example, calling someone a bad parent.
Is english your primary language? If it is, you need serious help, because your reading comprehensions is abyssmal. If english a second language, I congratulate you becuase you write english much better than I speak or write any second lanugages, but your comprehension still needs improvement. Keep at it, you will get there pretty soon!
First, the “e” in English should be capitalized. Next, “comprehensions” should be singular. Also, you’ve left out a word in your third sentence, probably “is”.
Wow. I have seen people run afoul of Gaudere’s Law before, but I’ve never seen it whip anyone like a bad egg until today.
Hint, culture: you should neither criticize anyone’s writing of English nor mock anyone’s reading comprehension, unless you’re trying to assume the mantle of the God of Irony.
to the OP: admit you screwed up. Don’t quibble. Don’t try and backpeddle. Yelling at others for their lack of understanding the written word with your OP out there waving it’s arms yelling “lookit meeeeeeeeeee” is, well, ironic at least.
culture, you are seriously[ gonna get your ass whipped, beaten stiff, formed into teaspoon-sized balls, covered in shredded coconut, baked at 350 degrees for 5-10 minutes and turned into macaroons, dude.
I hear that rimjobs are incredible. I’ve never gotten one, probably never would. But if I had your ability to stick your head firmly up your own ass, I’d probably give myself one every day of my life.
But could you please yank your dim-witted pinhead out of your craphole for a minute and address the points raised in this thread? Because currently you’ve only managed to come across as a complete jackass who can’t differentiate between masturbation and smashing your dick with a sledgehammer.