No need for jealousy. I’m sure plenty of people love you too, despite your shortcomings.
If you want to say that her claims are inconclusive or not sufficient to establish Kavanaugh’s guilt, I might disagree, but that’s at least a decent and reasonable charge.
But what you’re suggesting is known falsity, and there’s nothing to suggest that her claims were false, and deliberately made in such fashion.
You are deliberately misrepresenting her testimony, and it seems that you do so blithely. So Andy’s charge that you’re a piece of shit seems valid.
I’d honestly think that being on Steophan’s side in a misogyny related discussion would give people pause.
Well, if I know one thing about integrity, it is that major political parties should really take advice from people like you who called the investigation an electoral ploy – man, if they don’t investigate, the Dems will lose the support of people like you who never cared about an investigation in the first place.
The stakes could not be lower.
The people who want to prohibit even investigating an accusation of a crime are not on the side of good or the law. You have to investigate before you can know if an accusation is false. If you’re sure they were lying before the investigation, then it can only be for political reasons.
You’re the asshole who tried to spread lies about me on the snarkboard. Specifically, that I got hammered and got behind the wheel and, in a glassy-eyed stupor, mowed a few people down, killing them. I also was hurt and had to have surgery. After my surgery I needed cash for drug money. So i sued the doctors who saved me. Ka-Ching!
Dude I didn’t even know who the fuck you were before you did that. We had never had any sort of interaction. For you to do such a nasty, random, mean thing to someone you didn’t even know in the slightest was weird and a little breathtaking. I can’t even imagine how shitty it must feel to wake up every morning knowing you’re you.
I didn’t know this. Do you have a cite for these posts?
Just make sure to keep it out of the meat grinder. That only feels good for about the first fifteen seconds. So I hear.
The evidence does *not *show that Kavanaugh did not assault Ford. There’s a BIG difference between evidence that unambiguously exculpates the accused (“Your honor, the accused was in a coma in the ICU at the time. Here are the hospital records.”) and not having sufficient evidence to establish guilt. Murderers have walked because there wasn’t enough evidence to establish their guilt.
Not having evidence doesn’t mean the person is innocent; it simply means there isn’t enough to convict.
That, of course, is in a court of law, but it applies here, too.
Despite your obvious misunderstanding of terms like “based on the evidence,” and your apparent unfamiliarity with the Ford-vs-Kavanaugh accusation and hearing (the one that took place in Reality Land, outside of your head), I must agree with the above statement.
Non-human animals do NOT make false accusations against people.
So the take away is, you really did fuck those chickens.
Congratulations, you’re human!
Well, that’s one of us.
But it doesn’t prove their guilt, either.
Denying Kavanaugh the position on the SC would not have been an injustice. Nobody is entitled to that job. There were sufficient reasons to pass on his nomination and find somebody less controversial. But, as with so many things, it became more important for Republicans to extend the middle finger to Democrats (again), than to take a step back and consider a more equitable course of action.
I assume you would say the same for Merrick Garland, who also wasn’t entitled to the job.
Regards,
Shodan
True. That’s why he failed to impress anyone during his confirmation hearing.
oh snap
My goodness.
Serious question: What has Garland done that compares even remotely with allegations of harassment and partisanship against Kavanaugh? (Or was your comment just some word play?)
Nah, he’s just doing a “look over there!” thing by saying “Well Obama’s guy wasn’t entitled to the job either.”
conveniently leaving out the part where Mitch McConnell was a complete obstructionist shitweasel and refused to hold hearings.
I had Mr. Regards on Ignore for some years, and took him off just recently doing housekeeping. He seemed sincere compared to our trolls, sealions and utter scum.
But the insipid comment about Garland was jarring. I want to give Shodan a chance to explain. Heaven help the SDMB if Shodan is our top right-wing intellectual, but who elsee do we have?