No, Andy, that was not my intent at all. In fact, I very much doubt you do. I apologize if I caused you emotional distress by that misinterpretation. I just think the cringey type of politically masochistic white man depicted there describes you well.
Did you not read your cite?
Not sure what to take from your post other than that you think that iiandyiiii resembles the description given in the opinion piece.
Pretty much explicitly is accusing him of having something ugly underneath and mistreating women.
Otherwise, what exactly were you trying to get at?
Attention.
Only that he reminds me of the type of guy described, in terms of their outward behavior. I’m not endorsing the implication that such an outward persona is likely to mask an abuser (a dubious proposition to be sure). Again, I apologize for the misunderstanding.
]
That’s an interesting debating tactic: take any view you like, create a lengthy podcast then say: unless you read it, I am right.
In fact, I could create 10 such podcasts:
- murder is good (2 hrs)
- racism is good (3 hrs)
- Earth is flat (4 hrs)
- Moon landing fake (5 hrs)
- Aliens live in the moon (3 hrs)
- etc
and I am right because you did not listen to them.
FFS can we just end this thread? What’s with the bump?