Go to hell. Go to hell. Go to hell!
And learn the difference between a stupid racist assertion and a fucking fact you goddamned, racist, retard!
So Chief Pedant and Chief Pendant are racists?
Damn. Sucks to be them. 
I usually manage to avoid losing my temper with the old goat, most of the time, anyway.
With his gift for making confident assertions about subjects he doesn’t understand, he could have a second career as a politician or CEO.
You would have done better to simply stay in GQ. Starting a pit thread as a place to yell, scream and stomp your feet about a debate opponent you are frustrated with in GQ is pretty weak.
It makes you look like a hysterical pillow biter, not a rhetorical opponent to be respected.
You’re probably right. I guess I don’t care about being mature; I’m not really a mature person. I’m a strictly just-the-facts type of person, but these race realists always fucking get to me.
Their mentality is ten shades of warped and, especially with that worthless-hump Chief Pedant, they don’t care about being correct or accurate. They repeat the same tired old racist assertions. Bullshit piled on top of bullshit. Assertion piled on top of assertion.
GD.
I recommend focusing less on what meets your definition of “racist” and focusing instead on data.
One of the traps I see folks falling into is assuming that ascribing a view to racism makes that view incorrect. There is no a priori plan of Nature to make us all equal, and the idea that it’s horrible to suggest we are not equal, is a social construct. It’s not some sort of litmus test for the legitimacy of an idea.
It’s data that makes views incorrect; not labels.
PS: I wish I could have my best people give you a big hug. Seems like you could use one right now.
PPS: If I had it to do again, I’d be Chief Pendant. Seems like an upgrade, doesn’t it?
Data is another word for patterns detected by humans and can be coloured, pardon the pun, by the viewpoints of those who are seeking the patterns. Just saying, Chief.
Well said. But you’re missing the whole point of hurling the “RACIST” accusation: it’s to dismiss the arguments so one won’t have to debate them.
Or to point out that they are, indeed racist.
Which, true or not, does not further the debate. An argument has merits and failings, addressing those things is what furthers the debate. In one respect, calling someone a racist is akin to calling someone a poopyhead, a simple ad hominem. But it goes further: it seeks to disparage the source of the argument, rather than the argument itself. It seeks to dismiss the points made, like the OP did here.
I’ve seen orcenio participate in several of these threads. And he’s got absolutely nothing. He doesn’t like arguing facts because the facts don’t support his position. Instead he just calls his opponents “racists” and “race realists.” If he had the ability to argue the facts, I think he would have by now.
Well, there are those who have said you would look better hanging!
Not at all. He’s actually more informed the real science behind these issues than any of the posters he criticizes.
More informed by at least an order of magnitude.
Your problem, RR, is that you don’t know what you don’t know, and you repeatedly attempt to derail these threads by bringing up global warming.
Could you link to a post where orcenio brings the science? I’d appreciate it.
Also, I’m not attempting to derail these threads by bringing up global warming. I’m just interested in how people’s opinions differ on certain scientific topics. I’ll start my own thread on this eventually, and I’ll shut up about it in other threads until then.
Did someone bring up global warming?
I dont understand this racist-blame game, seem a little bit infantile
Would it be racist to say that african-americans in general are better in particular sports compared to other ethnic groups?
Or is there no such thing as ethnic differences?
You are mentally challenged !
Well, I’m not above either using “a simple ad hominem” or dismissing arguments wholesale.
This happens when I think the other person is an idiot or (more importantly) they are making me repeat the same points (or cite the same sources) over and over again in an attempt to wear me out. If you don’t play these games, I will treat your posts with respect.
As for me using the word “racist.” Yes, I use it. Yes, I use it fucking often. I don’t fucking care. You want to know why? I encounter so many idiots who try to pull the coy “I’m not a racist. Preaching the racial superiority/inferiority of certain races, is not racism per se…blah blah blah” I just got sick and tired of this coy shit.
Just awhile ago there was this idiot who was trying to fucking REDEFINE RACISM just so that no one could call him out as a racist when he brings up and defends race theory!
I’m sorry. 18th century race theory… that’s fucking racist! You want to preach it. You’re a fucking racist. Don’t be goddamned coy! I have no respect for that stupid bullshit.
If you look on the internet you will find many names for the idiots from this sub-culture. Some which try to sanitize what they are preaching (race realism: “we are realists”), or give it a scientific veneer (racialism: “We study races”) and even omit any reference of race (human Bio-diversity: “We study bio-diversity in humans”).
But it’s all the fucking same thing: “Blecks iz dum!”
How the fuck am I?
Hardly. It is used to show that someone has their mind made up already and interprets everything to confirm their biases. It shows that someone will take superficial data and make broad, sweeping conclusions based on that data. While it seems like schoolyard shouting (and this OP is certainly that), knowing someone is racist is beneficial when arguing because there is no possible way to convince that person otherwise.