And the worst thing is that SI’s “carefully researched posts” still led others like me to realize that they actually did not show exactly what he wanted to show, then it was noticed that the issue of inadequate school funding is really a different discussion. But it was better to hijack his own thread as it was clear that a couple of his previously “carefully researched posts” actually showed that Murray and others really spewed shit about how Hispanic students could not improve if they got better aid or resources.
He was on Sam’s podcast a couple months back! But then later Sam had to sort of apologize because Picciolini had basically slandered someone and Sam didn’t catch it at the time because he didn’t know enough about the person.
That James Damore is a right wing extremist? That is true, he is the asshole who sent out that sexist email.
I am not claiming that he fully swallowed the *red pill *and he backed off after Charlottesville but he was being vetted by these groups and his vetting was discussed on one of their sites. I am not sure how far down the rabbit hole he went though but he was associating with them.
If there are leaks after this weekend I’ll post the discussions but I refuse to link to the actual site. Plus if you have a ‘cuck’ inside that feeds you information it actually puts peoples lives at risk to disclose this info if there isn’t a public leak.
I only take the hearts and minds path and refuse to dox anybody BTW, Christian may have had more info then I have access to but probably feels the same way.
You should’ve found fault with Harris’s ridiculous and false assertions about race (that it’s a primarily biological classification, when it’s very clearly primarily societal, with only a very slight correlation with biology), as well as his utter failure to challenge Murray on any of his ridiculous assertions. /QUOTE]
We’ve fought this out already, and discovered there’s no answer. Sam doesn’t know the answer, I don’t know the answer, Murray doesn’t know the answer, Slacker doesn’t know the answer, and you don’t know the answer. None of us has ever claimed to know the answer.
So stop saying “ridiculous”. You sound like Kimstu.
And I will have to add that it looks like nachtmusick, like SlackerInc, missed post #1670. That is what most of academia (teachers, professors) approach guys like Murray and even Harris or Reich: with very little respect.
The University of Alabama podcast (for the ones that bothered to listen to) shows also that the makers of it, teachers and professors of Anthropology and Historians of science, point also at how well they regard the reply that Ezra Klein made to Harris and Murray in VOX, with the caveat that they pointed out that Klein missed even more chances to ‘cut down to size’ Murray, Harris and the rest of the “scientific” racists.
Yes, citing it is the key, as in making a proper quote. And if you were as smart as you claim you could already had figure it out how to make a cite of a podcast with Google and a desktop computer.
Also, it is noticeable that you have not bothered to reply to what the professors told you about Murray, Harris and Reich.
All sniping aside: if you tell me how to do that, I will be genuinely appreciative and will gain a new respect for your resourcefulness. Sincerely. And it will make my posts more palatable to you and others who have complained. Win-win all around, amirite?
Using Google Drive is the key, the difference is that: it is not one’s mouth where one points the microphone at, but one points the microphone to the central speaker used by one’s computer. If one wants to create a quote seen as important, one stops the podcast, sets the Google document, set a microphone next to the speaker, activate the Voice Typing Tool and see the text pop in to the document.
Of course it is not perfect, some editing had to be done as some “Yay’s!” or fake grunts to clear throats, or “You heard that, Murray?” lines pop up.
There is clearly a time limit, but one just stops the podcast when the text stops, stop the text recorder and then press record again after restarting the podcast to continue to capture a bit more until the lines that you need are in the page.
Then one hears the bit of that podcast again to compare and correct some words that were wrong and one gets a rebuttal to nonsense from the OP like this one:
So, no, it wasn’t forbidden knowledge, it was just that a spewer of bile like Murray got a smart but gullible guy like Harris to give him an even bigger megaphone than the one Murray already had before.
WTH, backstab much? Sam gave him a whole episode (probably two hours) with a large platform and didn’t even contest anything he said that I can recall. In fact, my cousin I told you about, that I pulled off the alt-right ledge by getting him into Sam’s podcast, quit listening in disgust after hearing half of it.
It’s remarkable to me (well, perhaps not so much after reading your posts for a few years) that your reaction here is about some supposed betrayal, or loyalty that Sam ought to be due, rather than whether those beliefs of Picicolini’s might be sincere and rational.
There’s actually a better way to do that part, if available. If your sound card has the stereo mix option, you can select that as your input, and it will just be straight from the audio in your computer.
If that’s not available, there’s a hardware solution where you get a male-to-male cable and plug it into the line out and line in (often the same port as the mic) on a computer, and then use that.
This is often used for recording audio off a computer. It’s how I used to record my DRM audio books (so I could listen to them on my MP3 player) when I couldn’t find any way to crack the DRM.
It’s weird to me that anyone attesting to be assessing a topic rationally gives any credence to some idea of loyalty. Facts have no loyalty. They are just are.
He may not have been sure of it at the time; he may not have been comfortable challenging him in person; or a million other reasons. I don’t see why that matters, unless you’re trying to do something silly like challenge his honor or manliness.