They are the order that the movies were made and the order in which most of us saw them. Plotwise 1-3 should almost be treated as the end of a series, rather than the beginning. At the end of The Empire Strikes back the audience was shocked to find out that Vader is Luke’s father. It wouldn’t have near the impact if you had seen episodes 1 - 3 and already knew that. Likewise, the Han, Leia, Luke love triangle in 4-6 would seem kind of silly if you already knew that Luke was Leia’s brother.
In general, I will always say that a series should be viewed/read/whatever in the order in which they were produced, not in chronological order. If 1-2-3-4-5-6 is the “right” order, then why didn’t Lucas make them in that order? Surely he didn’t expect all those folks back in the 70s to wait two decades to see the movie, so as not to spoil anything.
Yes. If you have to include 1-3, put them at the end because anyone who starts with those may not care about the other 3 by the time they’ve endured the first 7+hours.
The problem is that 1-3 are more or less reliant on having seen 4-6. Oh, the plots are coherent enough, but seeing 1-3 first robs both trilogies of dramatic and emotional impact.
I agree with what others have said. The plot is revealed in such a way that 4-5-6 must be seen before 1-2-3. 1-2-3 would suffer from not having the foreknowledge of what happens in 4-5-6, and 4-5-6 would suffer from being utterly spoiled if 1-2-3 are viewed first.
[hijack]
I feel similar (though to a lesser extent) about the Narnia books (about which there was a brooh-ha-ha a few years back). Character and plot develop in any writer’s works in a unique way as they live in the author’s mind. Watching or reading an author’s version of a character that’s been worked on for 7 years stuffed in between versions of a character that was just being created, for example, can be jarring and ruin narrative flow, even if it’s appropriate to the chronology of the story.
[/hijack]
Really? I mean, I agree that 2 and 3 are inferior to 4, 5, and 6, but 2 and 3 have redeeming features (Ewan Mcgregor really does do a good job as Obi Wan) and 1 is just horrid. I’m surprised to see the hatred directed specifically at 2 and 3, rather than at 1.
I vote 4-5-6(minus Ewoks)-stop. Nothing was added by filling in the backstory to the primary story of the Rebellion, save for several billion dollars of artless revenue.
And just for the record, the Chronicles of Narnia are 2-3-4-5-6-1 and maybe 7.
Ahem, it’s “No, I am your father.”
Count me with 4-5-6-1-2-3. Plus, then you’d already know that Luke and Leia are twins as well. AND, if we’re talking someone who’s completely unaware of the entire series, they’d be surprised at Yoda’s introduction in 5.
(oh, and the Ewoks are cool. Read the Wraith Squadron books and you’ll understand)
or you could not even bother, as in at all. honestly in retrospect the entire series is pretty weak, 1, 2, & 3, just proved beyond all shadow of doubt what a lucky hack Lucas really is.
or you should go 4, 5, 6, then 1, 2, 3.
4, 5, 6 (yeah I know, stupid ewoks, what the fuck ever - it still had Han Solo in it, and Bikini Leia, and as far as I’m concerned that makes it cool.)
Fuck 1, 2, 3. I would never show those to my kids or to anyone else. They’re movies with no redeeming qualities.