Maybe next time the Iranians do something bad, Steve Bannon can go make a public statement calling the Ayatollah a “big poo-poo head who has butt cooties” and you’ll cheer that Trump is really sticking it to our enemies.
Or maybe the response could just be a Tweet: “Iran is weak and sad. Sad!” That’ll send you into an orgasmic tizzy of hero worship.
nm
Thanks for the serious response, but what does any of it mean? “Not put up with it anymore?” “Won’t look the other way?” Are these vague statements now believed to be actions?
I’m not kidding. I don’t get it. Is Trump going to start a real war because Iran, which probably has thousands of missiles, tests a new missile? Is Trump going to just talk tough, like Iran is Rosie O’Donnell? Is he going to start ignoring Iran like they are CNN or something? Tell me what “Trump has had enough of Iran” means in real terms.
Nearest I can tell, he’s probably going to cut a deal with the Russians to keep Assad, the huge friend of Iran, in power. I seriously question whether he knows that Assad is very close with the Iranians.
You and others on this forum didn’t understand Trump at all during the campaign and it is quite apparent that you still don’t understand anything about him.
They’ve now been put on notice. The next time will not be a notice anymore.
My mental image of Blinkyandpinky.
You apparently don’t understand him either, because you can’t explain it. Next time is going to be what, TRIPLE secret probation?
[quote=“Buck_Godot, post:45, topic:778776”]
My mental image of Blinkyandpinky.
[/QUOTE]No, he won’t be in any personal danger at all.
With Trump in office we’re all in danger, he just doesn’t realize it yet.
There is nothing to explain.
Nobody knows what specific events will occur in the future yet, but I do know that the response will not be Obamian, which is to say weak and do nothing, while rewarding the enemy.
Well, you’ve already established that you think “you’re on notice!” is a strong action, so I submit that you think everything that Trump does is strong.
Yes, I definitely do think that “you’re on notice!” which was said today is a strong and good action. It’s only the beginning, but the necessary warning was given, so now that’s out of the way.
The near future will probably prove which one of us is correct.
Is that like the little old ladies and the “I unfriend you” thing?
Either way it’s Obama’s fault.
Pretty much.
Obama releasing all of that money to Iran and that foolish nuke deal is like the equivalent of sending cash and giving arms to Germany in 1938.
Yes, just like giving arms to Godwin – I mean Nazis – except for the small detail that nobody thinks that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon after the deal.
I do. We’ll see who’s correct eventually.
That’s because you a weak, scared little coward.
Sad.
Did you have to? The idea that he actually managed to scare someone just gave Blinky the most powerful orgasm he’s had since last month, when he showed a Doberman whose boss by giving it the finger, from behind a fence.
Bannon needs a war. It’s in the despot’s procedures manual. I think we just found out who it’s going to be against.