Bullshit.
So the only reason you have a house is to protect your ethnicity? Otherwise, I could just manage your property for you, make decisions about your home’s rules, and direct your budget for you, right? There’s no other reason except racism that you wouldn’t let me do that?
My goal is freedom of association for whites. If whites want to prevent non-white immigration, they should be free to do that if they have the votes after a free and fair debate.
If whites want to set up a white church, they should be free to do that without $PLC “anti-racists” spying on them and getting them fired from their jobs for being “racist.”
If whites want to set up an all-white school with a Eurocentric curriculum where their children will not be taught they are the cancer of human history, we should be able to do that.
If a landlord wants to built an apartment complex and rent to whites only, he should have the freedom to do that.
Nonsense.
We are not talking about individual houses. We are talking about ethnic homelands. There is no reason whatsoever for Native American reservations to exist but to prevent the total absorption of the Native American population into the general multicultural population.
They have no other reason for being.
People are murdered all the time. The question is whether their race has anything to do with it. You’d expect more white rape murder or rape victims in places where white people are the most numerous, for example. Are white people more likely to get murdered in South Africa than black people? I’m inclined to doubt it. The same goes for white women in the U.S.:
This suggests black women are much more likely to get raped than white women. For some reason you’ve glossed over this so you can talk about black men raping white women. There are about six times as many white people in the U.S. as black people, but in rapes that falls to a 3:1 disparity. That’s worse than the Birth of a Nation scenario you’re talking about.
Ignored, not repressed. That ought to tell you something.
No. We cannot all agree on that. There is no need for even one single person to die for a genocide to take place. “Killing members of the group” is only one of the five enumerated genocidal strategies prohibited under international law.
Moreover, if Hitler had not only allowed a bunch of Germans to move into Jewish neighborhoods, taught Jewish children in school to hate their ancestors, taught them that the only way to be a good human being is to renounce their Jewish identity, and demonized any gathering of Jews getting together to celebrate their heritage and talk about their rights, then yes that would most certainly be genocide.
What do you think would happen if such policies were implemented in America today? What do you think Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League would have to say about such an attack on their people?
This statistic shows up pretty often in these sorts of discussions- it’s based on a survey of about 77000 people, in which 56 (which seems like an awfully low number) reported rape or sexual assault (including unwanted groping, touching, kissing, etc). Generally, sexual assault to rape is reported at about 15 or 20 to 1, so only about 4 cases (out of the 56 reported by 77000 people) were probably rape as opposed to assault.
In short, bunk extrapolation.
And this will alleviate “White Genocide” how?
And because nobody listened, little white girls died, just another human sacrifice to the cult of diversity.
In many cases, the law is against you & most whites now agree with those laws. Living in the Segregated South was distressing even for us whites.
You are quite free to open any kind of private school you like. However, you won’t get any tax money in the form of vouchers. Even in Texas.
As Jewish philanthropist Ron Torossian explained, Jews must have social spaces, such as schools, to get together and meet other Jews, so they can marry and have children. Demanding government funding for Jewish academies, he argues:
"American Jews intermarry at a rate of nearly 50%, assimilation is at an all-time high – and it appears that education is the primary path to ensure Jewish continuity. According to sociologist Steven Cohen, Jewish school attendance increases a Jewish child’s likelihood of marrying another Jew by 14 percentage points. Naturally it also impacts other arenas of an individual’s Jewish identity. What issue today poses a larger threat to the American Jewish community than the sweeping tide of assimilation? In years past, certain Jewish organizations argued about the importance of a separation of church and state. Clearly, this concern pales in comparison to the fact that American Jewry is voluntarily withering away.
Education isn’t cheap – tuition at American Jewish schools averages $14,000 a year, and it’s a heavy burden to pay for many parents. Lowering costs makes a big difference – an experiment last decade at a Cleveland Jewish day school showed that cutting tuition from roughly $10,000 to around $5,500 led to an enrollment increase of 20% over three years. And why should Jews be taxed to pay for public schools which don’t provide a curriculum geared towards securing our people’s future?"
White people are free to do that- but not enough white people seem to want to in order to win the issue at the ballot box. So you’re just complaining about being on the losing side of this particular political issue.
White people are free to set up a white church, but they are not free to suppress the speech of organizations like the SPLC. And, unfortunately for you, bigots are not a protected group in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Feel free to organize and lobby for bigotry to amend that act and add a “bigotry protection” provision- you have that right.
At least in America, anyone can set up a school and teach whatever they want, or teach their children whatever they want.
Sorry, this is prohibited by various bills of fair housing legislation. You are free to try to organize and lobby for bigots to change this legislation.
Most whites are to beaten down with guilt and shame to even allow themselves to think about what is in their best interests.
Still, a poster above said that whites are “racist” and flee integrated neighborhoods to escape diversity. This is true, no matter how much they pay lip service to diversity.
Maybe if little Antonio Santiago or Brittney Watts lived in segregated neighborhoods, he’d still be alive.
This is bullshit of the highest order. Whites, along with everyone else in the country, already have freedom of association.
Minor problem with that bigoted bullshit: the country is not a “white country” regardless of your and your friend’s bullshit. It’s a democracy and there are constitutional provisions to prevent running roughshod over someone’s rights no matter their race or ethnicity.
Wait. You’re upset that a group that is specifically against hate groups isn’t permitted to decide for itself with whom it will associate? Silly me, I thought you were all about freedom of association.
I went to public schools, mighty fine ones at that, and was never taught that bullshit.
Actually, he shouldn’t. Protecting that option, bluntly, would be rewarding bad behavior. It’s bad for society to have a racist society.
I talked about the racists who engaged in White Flight, years ago in the US–comparing them to Brits who’ve left London for various reasons. Neither group was shoved onto trains & delivered to death camps.
Now property values are rising Inside The Loop, as diverse neighborhoods close to cultural activities (& good restaurants) become more attractive. Even our suburbs are more diverse than they were–with Hindu temples & Asian shopping/restaurant districts. Oh, the city votes Democratic–as other Texas cities do.
Whites are not endangered, but white supremacists are. Their numbers shrink every day. I can see why you’re nervous. Texas Republicans sure are…
(Links to YouTube are even more worthless than those going to The Daily Fail. But it’s fun to research the sources of the YouTube trash at SPLC!)
I’m not gonna get an answer, am I…
White Survivalist, in cultural terms, the trend is very much going in the other direction - people around the world are giving up their traditional cultures and languages and embracing larger, macro-cultural trends - a progression that ultimately ends in people speaking English. In terms of how people live, it is they, rather than us, who assimilate; it is their cultures that are finding themselves on the brink of extinction.
How do you feel about that?
Nonsense. White people have never wanted their children reduced to minority status, but it never mattered because we were never given any say so about whether we wanted to be exterminated or not.
Indeed, British Labour party insiders have revealed that Tony Blair’s government deliberately lied about immigrationbecause they knew Whites didn’t support it.
Moreover, the firing of Pat Buchanan reveals that the mainstream media will not allow whites any forum to discuss whether they support their own genocide or not, because white genocide is “inappropriate for a national dialogue.”
“Bigot” just means White people who want White people to continue to exist.
There are no “anti-racists” spying on black churches demanding that they become more “diverse” and getting congregants fired if they say they like attending church with other blacks.
Why? Because there is no conspiracy to exterminate black people, just White people.
Not for long. Barack Obama has decided that directing the education of your own children is not a fundamental right.
I respect the right of all peoples and cultures of the world to preserve their heritage.
Why is the Dalai Lama a national hero and revered spiritual leader for opposing the genocide of the Tibetan people by forced integration with Han Chinese colonists in their own traditional homeland, but we White preservations are “racists” and “bigots” for opposing the EXACT SAME POLICIES?
It doesn’t matter that they weren’t shoved onto trains. Ethnic cleansing is a crime against humanity. White Brits were driven out of London by non-white crime, especially rape gangs targeting little white girls.
Moreover, if you are celebrating “diverse” suburbs, you are saying you like diversity. But if you like diversity, why do you support White genocide?
Is ethnic diversity a good thing or not?
Or is jt just a good thing when it means less White people?
When anti-whites like you talk about “diversity”, you are just using that as a euphemism for White genocide.
What’s the name of the country that is occupying White World (or whatever) and trying to wipe out its culture through forced immigration? Come on now - you said there was a conspiracy, so tells us about it!! No fair holding out on us.