Is 'Anti-Racist' just a Codeword For Anti-White??

I’m white and have lived in London for well over ten years and frankly your hysterical description of Whites being “run out” is at extreme odds with reality. In fact not even the author of that piece says they’ve been “run out”; to be honest, he doesn’t really say anything at all other than movement is happening, it’s probably for bad reasons he can’t articulate and he doesn’t like the BBC much. Which is pretty much par for the course for the Telegraph.

The major factor driving movement in the Southeast is house prices, not headlong flight to escape the evil non-whites (especially considering that the biggest immigrant wave in the last decade was from Poland). You’ll note that the author of that opinion piece distinguishes “White British” from “Eastern European”, even though Eastern Europeans are pretty damn white too. And you’ll also note that he also focuses on the East End (Bethnal Green, Barking, Dagenham) which has been the scene of new waves of immigrants displacing old ones going back to the Hugeunots. He, like you, is selecting a few random factoids, taking them out of context, and implying something unsupported by any real evidence.

But please do continue to cherry-pick a few tragic anecdotal cases and claim that they somehow represent a trend. It only serves to illustrate the weakness of your arguments.

I am not quite sure what you mean.

I don’t want my children to be reduced to minority status, but they are both a different race than I am. So I guess you could say that I am participating in my own genocide. But I did have a choice in the matter.

And both are just as much a part of American culture as I am, because they were raised that way. So they aren’t going to change the American culture - they are perpetuating the best parts of it.

So perhaps we are going to be wiped off the face of the planet, but the perpetrators are quite cute and charming, and basically, no harm done that I can see.

Regards,
Shodan

I wouldn’t be surprised at all that the reason that clown doesn’t consider the Whites from Poland to “really” be White is because they’re likely to be gasp (I’m afraid I’ll be getting a case of the vapors, but I’ll say it anyway) Roman Catholic. :eek:

I mean, it’s not all that rare for racists to be bigots of more than one stripe.

Demographic changes are not genocide, not extermination. For most Americans, at least, increasing diversity is celebrated, or at least treated neutrally. If all the white people wanted something to happen, in either the USA or the UK, there are still enough of them to make up a majority. It sounds like you’re just whining that most white people don’t feel the same way as you.

You are incorrect about what “bigot” means.

Most black churches allow anyone to join their congregation. The ones that don’t are generally laughed at and ignored.

Another misinterpretation of events, what a surprise.

You don’t need a country. Treasonous international elites are more than sufficient.

Because when discussing the relative status vis-a-vis the Hans and the Tibetans, the disparity in power and number is so absurd, so utterly, laughably one-sided that it makes any talk of parity or fairness nonsensical, whether discussed in modern contexts or in the context of 50 or 100 or 200 years ago.

Like it or not, we ‘white people’ - people who speak and whose ancestors spoke Germanic, Scandinavian, or Romance languages, and whose ancestors were predominantly Protestant or Roman Catholic - we spend centuries striding over the world like an absolute colossus, and in almost all cases, this ended very well for us - or some of us - and very badly for all of them. The scars of that activity still persist to this day. That’s the difference. That’s why it’s okay for some people to insist on their own neighborhoods but not okay for others - because some cultures and communities, without their own neighborhoods, will go extinct. Ours is not one of them.

It’s like surgery. You can’t establish an axiomatic position that ‘nobody should ever cut another person with a knife’ or ‘nobody should ever be forbidden from cutting another person with a knife.’ It’s all about circumstance and need.

And again - the problem that you are describing doesn’t exist. When people come to America, their children will be well-assimilated and their grandchildren totally assimilated. We aren’t turning into them; they’re turning into us.

Also, where are the borders of the white race? For the purposes of this discussion.

Glad we’ve had an actual Brit weigh in to point out your errors there. You’re not as illiterate as the OP, but your comprehension is still deficient.

There’s no White Genocide. If you want more white people, find a white girl, marry her & breed…

Actually, sovereignty is a much, much older concept.

I am bumping my own question because I would like a definition of what constitutes “White” by either the OP or WS

Without this info I cannot figure out if I am a Genocidee or Genocider (are so words)

Please clarify

Capt

Saying Indigenous Whites are only being driven out because of house prices is rather like saying the aborigines were only driven off their lands because of demand for cattle grazing pastures.

Settler colonialism is recognized by genocide scholars as being inherently genocidal because the native population is being systematically replaced.

Now, these are not cherry-picked anecdotes, these are trends that are in place all over the Western World. Just recently, the BBC was even celebrating White genocide in Poland.

Do these “treasonous international elites” share any characteristics? Like any particular ethnic or religious background?

Just recently, the city of Pheonix decided that there weretoo many White lifeguards, so they went to “minority” high schools to recruit non-whites who can’t even swim to replace these lifeguards.

Why don’t you ask them who’s white?

Not too long ago, the police force in London was said to be “stubbornly white.” Why don’t you ask this author how he knows who is white and who isn’t.

You White genocide supporters never tell anti-whites there is no such thing as a white race when they are attacking us. You only do that when whites try to defend ourselves.

Moreover, you never ask Jewish advocates “Who’s Jewish?” You never ask black advocates, “Who’s black?” You never ask La Raza (“The Race”) activists “Who’s Hispanic”?

No, you only do that to White people because you support White genocide and don’t want Whites to be able to organize a resistance to our own extermination.

And have their nefarious plans ever been documented?

:wink:

Regards,
Shodan

No. There are white ones, black ones, Asian ones, and Jewish ones. These latter being the most numerous.

What is your point?

And I for one welcome our new cute and charming Shodan Jr. overlords.

So it’s actually not like the China and Tibet thing. And you’re still not explaining the international elite conspiracy thing. Who’s doing it and why?

Let me guess. They’re swarthy, aren’t they?

Hey FinnAgain - who’s Jewish?

Regards,
Shodan

So there are more Jewish “treasonous international elites” than white, black, and Asians? Is this an absolute majority, or just a plurality?

The point is that you’re dangerously close to storming into, through the front door of course, whacked-out nut-job conspiracy theory territory. Oops, my mistake. You already went there.

Already answered upthread. Here is a quote by an anti-White Jew who wants to reduce Australia to a colony of China:

“The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would be more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.” -Miriam Faine, editor of the Australian Jewish Democrat