“Conspiracy theory” is an absolutely meaningless term that serves no function but to shut down debate.
It is a slur propagated by the wealthy and powerful to discredit anyone who pays attention to what they are doing with their wealth and power. That’s all. Nothing more.
Tell me. Do you think filthy-rich people like George Soros use their money for political activism or not?
It must be pretty difficult to have such a weak and pathetic culture that all it takes is a good fuck to shatter it irreparably. I dunno about yours but my ‘white’ culture (and I say it like that because I never think of it in terms of skin color but in terms of familial connections, heritage and customs) is pretty banging and I don’t see any evidence its being displaced or destroyed by anything.
I must be stupid, but I’m going to need you to spell out, in explicit, obvious steps, such that a child could understand, the connection between that quote and your point.
You made a claim that members of a pretty tiny group, internationally, (Jews, that is), are the biggest part of the “treasonous international elites” that are organizing white genocide. That’s a particularly specific claim about a very small group. I’m just trying to get to the bottom of it.
You know it is impossible to reason with anti-whites, because no matter what you say, anti-whites always find a way to use it to ridicule your heritage and culture.
If I say I want to protect my culture, anti-whites accuse me of White supremacy, i.e. thinking my culture is superior. Then anti-whites turn around and say the exact opposite, that I must think my culture is inferior.
The truth is that Robert Putnam, a liberal Harvard Professor, has proven conclusively that diversity destroys communities. It is no longer a question open to dispute. More diversity not only alienates neighbors from those unlike themselves, but even people of *their own ethnic group. *
Therefore, anyone who demands that all white communities become “diverse” is, in effect, demanding that all white communities be destroyed, i.e. genocide.
I will remind you again of Raphael Lemkin’s formulation of genocide in his seminal volume on the subject:
“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
I would be happy too, as soon as you condemn the constant attacks on White people, whom you claim are just a “social construct”, as racist anti-white bigotry.
What difference does it make? The nature and identity of the wrongdoers has nothing whatsoever to do with the wrongness of the action. Why is deliberately destroying someone’s culture wrong if a country does it but okay if stateless international elites do it?
It makes no difference whatsoever. The point is that the act itself, the demographic swamping, is wrong and a genocidal assault on the Tibetan people.
I note you haven’t addressed my point. Possibly you didn’t understand it.
Both my children are different from me racially. Both of them are fully American in their culture. Are they engaging in genocide against whites, or not?
Need answer fast - my daughter will be home from school shortly, and I need to know whether or not to let her borrow the car.
“They” say this because “they” realize that, from observing the world and migratory trends, this is the only way the races will assimilate. There is no trend of white people moving in droves to India, Mexico, the Phillipines, etc. If they said in order to solve the race problem whites must move in droves to third world countries they would not be taken seriously, because it would contradict all observed behavior of at least the last 150-200 years.
Whoops! You seem to have confused “being forceably driven off of my own land at gunpoint” with “freely choosing to move to the suburbs to get away from those scary scary darkies that have started moving in.”
How strange that one group that was the target of a genocide and another that was victimized by centuries of commercial slavery are now the center of the conspiracy. That sounds more like paranoia or displaced guilt than anything else, but the evidence for the conspiracy is so strong… it’s almost as strong as the argument ‘Jews intermarry at a high rate, which is proof they’re manipulating the system so they can marry their own kind.’
You betcha. I unequivocally condemn Bigotry in all it’s forms, yes even anti white bigotry. I have even accused my Congress Critter, Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Houston) of anti white bigotry. Fair enough?
Now, I am of Scot/German descent with a little Native American, am I “White”? Carmen and I have children, she is Spanish(Manchega) are our children “White”?