BTW did anyone else notice who just popped up except Marley, tag team baby, tag team
Capt
That’s quite common in my experience among the racists, or race realists, or whatever- they think that all white people secretly hold the same opinions, but are afraid to speak them out. They can’t seem to understand that most white people really actually like most black, brown, Asian, etc., people, and have no problem living, working, and raising their families among them.
I guess you don’t know what mutt means. It is a hybrid; a blend of diverse breeds. So in the case of a mutt culture it is a blend of many diverse cultures. Germans started Christmas trees, but you won’t find any other Christian white household without one. Why? It’s not from their native culture? Because they took something from one culture and incorporated it into the melting pot you want to call white culture.
Again, you seem way too concerned about what other countries do. Maybe they’l change, maybe not. But in this country we’ve taken the best of many cultures and blended them. You want it to stop. I am against that.
So he has no scientific answer to the query, then?
Anti-racist’s just another word for anti-white poltroons,
It don’t mean nothing honey if we ain’t free, now now.
And feeling good was easy Lawd, when Stormfront sang the blues,
The Aryan race was good enough for me,
But the anti-racists won’t never let us be. 
What is really stupid about the current discussion, (beside the obvious), is the way in which this great fear of some imagined “genocide” is actually a fear that they might lose out on the semantic games they play.
How is the U.S. supposed to be overtaken by “non-whites”? Since people forcibly imported from Africa have seen no significant change in their percentage of population for decades, I am guessing that the fear is of the folks from Latin America. So who are they? A mixture of the descendants of European immigrants and the indigenous peoples that the so-called “white” people nearly annihilated when the Europeans invaded. To the extent that they have European ancestry, they probably qualify as “white” and to the extent that they do not have European ancestry, they are simply repopulating the land from which their ancestors were removed, (or should-have-been ancestors were killed).
How is Europe supposed to be overtaken by “non-whites”? Well, the majority of the people who are immigrating to Europe are either Turkish or Algerian and Libyan, (with the occasional Moroccan or Mauritanian for “color”). Now the Turks are white, (or would be if various fearful people with more imagination than education did not insist on torturing the English language). They are the people who were part of the Glory of Greece when Greece included Ephesus, Rhodes, Sardis, Samos, Halicarnassus, and dozens of other sites of renown. Ionia, in what is now Anatolian Turkey, is the source of our graceful Greek pillars. The Galatians of Christian epistolary fame were Celts (y’know, like Irish and Scots) who had wandered east and settled the regions of current Ankara and Konya. When fearful “white” types want to point to how wonderful their culture was, they point to Greece and Rome. Of course, now they don’t want to let Turks, (or Greeks or Italians), into their little club. It is fascinating to see champions of being “white” point to Rome, then deny Italians entry when ancient Rome was clearly better off before the even more “white” barbarians from the North invaded the Italian peninsula.
Nineteenth century ethnologists, with all their baggage, were at least honest enough to call all the people across the Middle East and North Africa “white”–using the identifier “Caucasian.” Now the fearful protectors of “white” want to pretend that “white” is some much smaller band of people (that they typically refuse to even identify even when trying to hang on the coattails of long-departed peoples whose descendants they shun).
Oh, and Algeria? Settled by “white” Phoenicians, then by “white” Romans, then by “white” Vandals and Visigoths. There were a few darker, (but still mostly “Caucasian”) Berbers that got in there, later, and probably a few darker Touaregs eventually got into the mix, but they are overwhelmingly “white” by any definition other than the imaginary ones used by the fearful defenders of “whiteness.”
It is all very sad to watch these folks twist and turn and wriggle to find a way to pretend that they have some glorious history that they borrow from people with whom they would not now associate while denying their close relationships to the people whom even racist ethnologists would acknowledge were part of the same overall group.
Of course, it is also hysterically funny.
So then how come you’re still logged in half-an-hour later.
Leave the personal insults for The BBQ Pit.
Knock it off.
[ /Moderating ]
Aye, aye. Just let him get to me
My apologies
Capt
Actually, I’m not “resorting” to anything. I’m pointing out yet another data point, in addition to your pathetically weak arguments, that indicates a severe ignorance of the subject matter in this thread.
No…It is the Anglo-elites that have orchistrated this attempted genocide-by-assimilation upon white populations. These are the people at the top of the countries of Greater Anglosphere. Jew, to my knowlege have not played a part in this attempt to genocide white populations. Why are you accusing Jews of taking part in attempting to genocide white people??? That is very strange indeed. You anti-semitism is most unsettling.
So an undefined elite of undefined countries is orchestrating the genocide-by-sexiness of an undefined population.
Riiiiight. :rolleyes:
Wow, that is just er, wow. Look out Dopers Marley is a plant from Stormfront, how has he duped us for so long. The shame. The shame :smack:
Capt
So what you’re saying is, white women are so intellectually inferior that they fall en masse for this obvious propoganda even when virile Aryan types like you are telling them the truth?
[shrug] “White, not of Hispanic descent” is a category on the Census, as I recall. But, I don’t need to know who is white or not, to know that there are whites and they vote.
“White” people are those generally recognized and treated as white.
That’s all there is to it. It’s a social construct, a category of mind, with no rigorous biological content at all (and therefore no non-arbitrary standard of “purity”).
Some people are white in certain places and social contexts, or certain times, and not in others.
No. We would just like to know whom you would consider “white.” You are the one making the specious claims about “genocide” and such and we are curious which of us you would (figuratively) let into the compound once you have hunkered down to defend yourselves. The very idea that Jews “could be” white if they “chose” to be white indicates a certain elasticity of definition that implies that it is all just made up stuff. You might be claiming to let Jews in, now, only to shut them out after you got whatever help you needed. So who else “could” be “white” and what makes a person “white” or “not white”?
Eh, I’ve seen it used on various occasions that way in fiction at least.
Ooh! Ooh! I got it! You make up a series of little color plaques, and you hold them up to people (face, forearm, whatever) and their “color” is the color number of the plaque that most closely matches their skin. A subset of those plaques are defined as “White.” Anybody identified as having skin of a “White” color is White.
Scientific. Objective. Not a social construct, not a category of mind. After all, isn’t that how we would define a “tall” person, or an “obese” person? A nice objective physical test. See how easy it all would be? Isn’t it just too Solomonic? :dubious: