Der Trihs: Don’t take this wrong, but isn’t it bad form to reference this thread in your answer to my question?
Again, you’ve missed the boat here by demanding what is and what is not white. There are more and more people every day identifying themselves as white. And these white dissidents are appealing them. It is ridiculous to go to someone who identifies as white as ask them ‘what is a white person.’ I have done that and the reply was very simple, but in a sense devastating because it was clear that this person understood white genocide. He asked me if I was an ‘anti-white’ because only and ‘anti-white’ would ask a quesiton like that.
Look at it this way…Nobody goes to black people and asks them what a black person is…Black people know who the hell they are, and it’s the same with asians as well. We only go after white people in this way because it is one component of the dehumanization process. I know this because I have done it for years.
Look, if there’s any genocide against White, then there must be a definition of White. Otherwise, those nasty folks committing said genocide very well might just exterminate another group and accidently avoid destroying any White people at all.
I’m a bit confused, before you claimed you were an anti-racist looking for arguments to use against racists, but now you seem to be arguing that there is an attempted genocide against white people.
Your arguments are remarkably similar to White Survivalist’s and you guys both seem to have just signed up to the dope and seem to be both posting exclusively on this thread, though curiously not at the same time.
Do you guys know each other?
Was he the “racist” friend who you were looking to use ammunition against?
I am saying that there is a program of genocide-by-assimilation toward white people. That’s not even the issue. The question is whether or not we are in favor of this system of white genocide-by-assimilation. I’m not going to deny that we are attempting to essentially eradicate the white race, because that is exactly what we are trying to accomplish.
I have seen white suvivalists arguments and they don’t surprise me one bit. I told you earlier that these white dissidents are now all over the internet and they are having a huge impact upon the hearts and minds of white people.
This is silly and we need to move up from these types of OLD STYLE anti-racist talking points that we used to throw at healthy normal white people who were bold enough to express racial self regard. Jesus Christ…WHITE PEOPLE KNOW WHO AND WHAT THEY ARE, IN ADDITION, THEY ARE NOW COMING TO UNDERSTAND WHO AND BY WHAT METHODS THEIR ENEMY HAS TRIED TO WIPE THEM OFF THE PLANET. That is what is important. Stop asking for a bio-definition of white people, because they can’t be manipulated by that method anymore. Those days are over.
They will just reply by saying the same thing over and over:
‘White people are those who our enemy has systematically targeted with a global white genocide-by-assimilation.’
They are NOT going to tailgate into a silly argument about the minutea of genetics.
This is their power right now and we need NEW responses to these kinds of insights.
They have **NO **power as it was already pointed out.
Of course it’s an issue, nobody believes that such a thing exists.
More gibberish. No, only a minority of fools believe any such thing, nor does such a program exist. And repeating this nonsense in all caps doesn’t make it any more true.
Finally an actual factual statement!!!
Well, come off it, then. Explain to the rest of the plebians “who and what” the Whites are. Failing that, then your muttering “Anti-White” all day is absolutely meaningless.
So it’s been a pretty ineffective genocide so far, then.
Actually, most plaque is white.
See your dentist.
There is no campaign of “large-scale violence against the natives”; only assorted crime in a poorer area of the city, just like any other major metropolitan area. You’ve seized on a few cases and extrapolated them into a huge trend while simultaneously - and openly - ignoring all other forms of crime:
You’ve basically admitted a huge confirmation bias in your “proof”. You’ve also conveniently ignored the major white-on-white child abuse cases I mentioned, which are certainly needed to provide context if you’re intending to suggest that your cherry-picked case shows that immigrant-specific crime is the major force somehow driving whites out of the city in the hundreds of thousands.
Or that it doesn’t exist. Which is a position there is far more evidence for.
These will be the “people” you’re refusing to identify, yes? How can you put their concerns first if you won’t even say who they are?
No, but your argument does. If you refuse to define one of the key terms upon which your argument is based, we are forced to conclude that you’re only doing so to hide the obvious flaws in the argument.
Oh, and nice ad hominem. For someone nitpicking minor logic flaws, you certainly present a lot of them.
Can we get the name of a specific victim of this genocide and the circumstances of his or her racial extermination?
Could this be the reason? {Note: certain words in that link are NSFW.}
He’s already provided his definition:
So, it isn’t him who has to define what he’s talking about, whiteness is in fact *defined *by being the target of assimilation by the non-whites. Whoever they are, these people who somehow want to produce mongrel babies with the likes of our friend here just to destroy his race …
So, who wants to ask him for the definition of non-white? Or any other definition of who constitutes these nasty genocidalists?
Why, isn’t it obvious? Just as the Whites are defined as those who are targeted for genocidification, Non-Whites are defined as those who are committing it! Very symmetrical. A circular argument is symmetrical, right?
Or, as Warren Beatty put it in Bulworth, “We just have to keep on fucking each other until we’re all the same color.”
There. Problem solved.
Can you find a defintion of Jew that is utterly watertight? Black? Aboriginal? Claims are made of Genocide against these groups. Yet when white people bring up a Genocide against them, they just “dont exist”.
When anti-racists want to attack whites, they have NO PROBLEM at all using the term WHITE. They have no problem pointing out when an area is too white. When white people speak in their racial self defence, all of a sudden, anti-racist anti-whites claim that whites don’t really exist.
You can’t have it both ways.