More than that, given that all other races are simply sub-populations of a completely African species.
I think you may be confusing the idea that 5% of “white” people have some recent African ancestry with what you posted. But if you have a cite, I’m happy to admit I’m wrong.
Please note the importance of “recent” in a discussion about human genes. Humans originated in Africa, so one might argue that all human genes are African genes.
It was, but all those black people somehow snuck into the country by cramming hundreds and hundreds of themselves into the holds of various ships as part of their cunning plan to commit genocide.
I’d love to know what the OP means by ‘white’, too.
Ben Franklin had an interesting, non-modern take on it:
[QUOTE=Benjamin Franklin]
Which leads me to add one remark: that the number of purely white people in the world is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the newcomers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal body of white people on the Face of the Earth.
[/quote]
I, for one, am happy that some people have made the White race so much more inclusive over the centuries so as to include those swarthy Swedes and Frenchmen.
Cite?
Plus all those Native Americans who snuck in here just as we were arriving!
Genocide is not a verb, by the way. Maybe the wannabe Nazis think it is. “I hope we can go genociding this weekend!”
No, it doesn’t. It’s not even close; this is like the old joke about how many legs a horse has if you call the tail a leg. This is one of the “errors” white supremacists make all the time - and I’m putting error in quotes because they don’t do it by accident. They treat something uncoordinated like immigration or intermarriage as a conspiracy, as if somehow all the people who were immigrating to predominantly white countries were coordinating their activities before they came over instead of being motivated by their own interests. It’s stupid if you stop and think about it.
Not even close to happening.
I can’t find a reliable cite for this quote. I think I did find one attributing it to an aboriginal activist instead, but mostly I just found racists copying and pasting it to comments on YouTube and newspaper articles. Even if Malcolm Fraser said this, it’s one guy’s opinion. So what?
That’s not happening, so who gives a crap? This is the kind of paranoid bullshit racists believe. If you’re talking to people who think this way, I’d encourage you not to waste your time. They’re not capable of being more reasonable about this.
Nobody is doing this to ANY Asian country, or ANY Black country.
Really?
The counterclaim goes like this: the stuff these people assert isn’t happening, as there is no eradication of white people or white culture (there’s no such thing anyway) happening on any national or international scale. White people aren’t being targeted and nobody is coming to predominantly white countries to force them to give up their jobs or intermarry. People with those views are paranoid and they’re usually jerks. On top of that they don’t define race or culture in any consistent or logical way. If you’re unable to argue with them, you may need more practice arguing - but the big problem is that you can’t force them out of their batshit crazy point of view. Nobody can. So you should find something else to do with your time.
You’ve been given plenty of intelligent ideas. If you need more help, let’s see your first effort.
Me, I’m mainly concerned about preserving all those white countries like the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Well, being that this is one of the most common anti-racist rhetorical questions to throw at white people, they have come up with a number of pretty formidable repliers:
-
“You anti-Whites have already defined the White race for us…You repeatedly say that it is defined as that specific group of people who must tolerate massive third world immigration, forced racial integration with these immigrants, and ultimately racial assimilation with them. And if White people do not accepts these conditions they are told that they are evilracistnazisinnerswhoaregoingtoburninhell; lose their jobs; are put in prison; and essentially lose their lives”
-
“Race is a social construct??
Should ALL and ONLY Black countries be flooded with hundreds of millions of non-Blacks who are then force assimilated into the Black population because “Race is a social construct”???
You anti-Whites ONLY ever argue for this to be done to EVERY White country and ONLY White countries. You are demanding and justifying the GENOCIDE of my people." -
“The UN Genocide Law, SPECIFICALLY recognizes the existence of RACE as an ‘Identifiable Group’, to prevent what anti-Whites like you are doing right now.
Your attempt to dehumanize my people, the White race, by saying we are a social construct and we do not exist, will not work.
Dehumanization is one of the 8 steps of genocide.
No one is going to Africa or Asia and telling the people there, Blacks or Asians do not exist. Anti-Whites are only doing this in all White countries and only White countries.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”
My goodness they have many more, but I’ll stop here. The point is that these white dissident types are consistently point out the insoluble contradictions and hypocracies encased in our anti-racist talking points and it is getting increasingly difficult to argue with these people because they are getting more white adherents every day. I’m not saying that we shouldn’t argue with them, but we need to do so with updated points that decisively refute the underlying claims of their points, and we have not been able to do this thus far.
Thanks
Who, specifically, is saying this to your “racist friends”? I live in the US and no one has ever said that to me.
So, who are the white people? I really want to know, as I’d like to join the cause!
Well, in 1965 it was approximately 90% white, then the borders were systematically broken down so that massive amounts of non-white third world immigrants could be let in, such that, now in 2013 it is roughly 66% white. Come on people, these white people are not stupid and they can certainly see these kinds of stats all over the place; it’s something that we can’t hide any longer. The white dissident types are using this fact to demonstrate what the anti-whites at the top of, what they call, Greater Anglosphere want to do to ALL the other white countries, and they are calling this the genocide of white people. To the average white person this is very powerful, especially when they begin to realize the absolutely massive non-white on white violence that is so prevalent in those white countries that have had this non-white immigration forced on them.
Thanks
No, they haven’t. The question is why you think they’re so formidable. And I agree that you don’t need to keep quoting their arguments.
NO, you have to see what kinds of points they are coming up with. They are many, and they are having great influence on the hearts and minds of white people who are definitely beginning to externalize their heartfelt belief that they have been victimized by their own elites. This is a serious mindset that we anti-racists have contributed to simply because we are on the front lines screaming at white people whenever they want to assert their own racial self interests. They are beginning to see us as a very serious enemy, even when we are also white.
For us to begin to regain the high moral ground we have to be able to deal effectively with their talking points…and they have many. The biggest mistake that we can make is to fall into the mistaken belief that they are silly and will go away…to minimize them. THEY ARE HAVING A PROFOUND EFFECT UPON THE PSYCHE OF WHITE PEOPLE AT THIS POINT AND WILL INTO THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. That is something that we are going to have to grapple with.
Thanks
The UN recognizes the existences of race because assholes have already decided on racial classifications and act like murderous dicks based on that classification. If your stormfront friends weren’t so assholic, there would be no need to define a racial group for the purposes of legal protection. White people ain’t going anywhere. We’re shrinking as a demographic in some places but that’s ok. We don’t have a divine right to be the majority and if we’re not assholes to other demographics, we have no reason to expect them to be assholes to us.
There’s stupid, and then there’s brain-dead.
This isn’t a “formidable” reply. You are either unwilling or unable to accept some people have no intellectual honesty (and possibly no intellect) but somehow think such people will debate in good faith.
See above.
(also: name one country where this happens anywhere. Blindingly obvious trollish and easily disproven “facts” aren’t “formidable”. They’re just dumb. And not even kind of entertaining dumb but dumb dumb.)
See above.
Also: the UN doesn’t pass laws. It passes conventions individual countries adopt (or not) and provides a simple framework to define terms. Worse yet, this goes beyond racist BS and into full anti-UN conspiracy nutbaggery about the (lack of) power the UN really has.
It’s factually in error and still just plain dumb.
Why?
As repeatedly noted, they are uninterested in facts. They are uninterested in debating in good faith. And no amount of reality intrudes upon their “truth”.
If you believe “we have not been able to do this thus far”, you need to look up once in a while. Some percentage of any population is completely resistant to anything that contradicts their worldview. Why do you believe giving them yet another platform to spew their illogical, incoherent rambling is useful at all?
Speaking as a white person, they’re really not. Other than making me feel cranky and tired.
No, actually, that “specific group of people” would be Americans – white, black, brown and red Americans; we’re all in the same boat as far as “massive third world immigration” is concerned. (Or, substitute for “Americans” the demonym of any “white” country, it’s all the same.)
That already happened, remember? European colonial imperialism? It lasted about 500 years? At least 100 in Africa specifically? And it was not done by white people who regarded “race” as a social construct, quite the reverse.
Saying that “race is a social construct” is not “dehumanizing” the people who might fall under this or that “racial” label; it is merely denying the validity/relevance of that label. You remain both existent and human with or without it.
Cite on crime statistics?
Come on! Violent crime is DOWN from the 90s in the US.
If you want to be taken seriously, you need to do better than this.
ETA: If you’re willing to take these kinds of “just-so” stories that “make sense” at face value and not even do basic fact checking, you have no argument. You expect other people to do the leg work you yourself are clearly not doing. Worse, you’re just accepting these kinds of statements without even thinking about them.
Are you talking about the Europe, here, or the U.S., or what? There are reports of increasing racism, xenophobia, and in particular Islamophobia in Europe, but not in the U.S. As has already been noted, Pat Buchanan-esque advocacy for sealed borders or a white, Protestant America appeals to a tiny minority, and a shrinking one.
Is there any point in debating someone whose arguments are so weak they’ll only make them in the third person?