Doing some heavy reading today as I usually do and contemplating the failures of Christianity as a substantive religion to believe in, I came across a common complaint that non-Christians like to make:
So we have a God as defined by Christianity who’s sole reason for making the universe and us was to give His only Begotten Son a big backyard to play in and an earthfull of pet humans that Jesus could demand worship from for Himself and His Old Man under threat of eternal torment if we don’t comply with the “worship Us for all eternity–or else”.
I used to buy into this scenario as a young Christian but as an old Christian it started making less and less sense to me and now I just cannot see any rhyme or reason to it.
I did have a lightbulb moment listening to a Richard Carrier debate today when he pointed out that the likeliest explanation for the whole “Jesus died as atonement for our sins” thing came into sharp focus when he alluded that it wasn’t until AFTER the destruction of the temple in 70 AD that the Jesus-as-atonement really got into full swing, and it made perfect sense to me why it had to happen AFTER the destruction, not before:
Before the destruction of the temple animal sacrifice was still going on to atone for sins so there was no need for Jesus to assume an atonement role–the animal sacrifices took care of that. It wasn’t until after they had no temple to make animal sacrifices in that they had to find a different way to atone for their sins. Someone looked at Jesus’ crucifixion and said, "Hey why not make this Jesus guy a kind of perpetual sacrifice for the sins of all mankind, then we don’t need the temple anyway and we can just forget about all these animals we have to slaughter day after day to atone for our sins? Why are we wasting good meat, all these turtledoves we could be cooking and eating instead of burning them to a crisp and wasting?
So the brilliant idea comes into existence: we don’t have the temple anymore; there’s nothing we can do about that–the Romans won’t let us build another one; let’s just adopt the idea that Jesus is our perpetual sacrifice for everlasting atonement and bingo both problems–the problem of no temple and no way to sacrifice–is completely solved.
I suddenly comprehended a large part of the divine puzzle: God now has a reason to demand us to worship His Son–because His Son gave His life as a ransom for our sins as stated in Mark (written, conveniently AFTER the temple’s destruction) so now we owe Him the debt to believe in Him or face eternal death in hell.
Honestly, the whole concept is so ridiculous, slip-shod, so stupidly thought out it just screams “idiocy”.
Why can’t we just have a God who created the heavens and the earth, set natural laws into motion to govern things, put us on this earth to start a growing process spiritually that is just the first step in an eternity-long program to grow towards Oneness with God.
So much simpler, don’t you think?