I’ve been wondering at this for a while. I consider myself to be very cynical; for example, for any of you in Australia, I believe that the “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” or whatever the hell it was called was designed simply as a cash grab for the government, and my gut reaction to seeing the word ‘democracy’ about 5 times on one page in an english textbook is that they are trying to brainwash us into being good patriotic children. Despite this, in general situations I consider myself to be fairly optimistic - I always tend to think to myself, ‘there are plenty worse off with I’ and simply get over my problems.
Don’t know if this belongs in GQ, but I consider myself the same way and I don’t feel its a contradiction. I’m optimistic, but not blindly optimistic. I maintain a high set of standards for things and since most other people don’t they see my constant criticism of what I see as mediocrity (but they see as normal) to be cynicism.
My optimism comes from always finding (so far anyway) at least a few people, places, things etc. that attempt to get things right.
The best answer to this comes from Anne Frank: “Despite everything, I believe that people are really good at heart.”
What an astoundingly optimistic statement from someone who was experiencing one of the most horrible circumstances in human history (though she wasn’t yet experiencing the worst of it when she wrote that). I tend to get extremely cynical at times, especially when watching the news. But if I take a few steps back, I can get optimistic about humanity’s future. We have gone through some pretty crappy times in our history, and in some respects we’re currently in one of those crappy times. But we’ve also achieved greatness, and there’s a lot of that right now as well.
Another quote: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”
A quote from Heinlen (from memory, not verbatim): “I am a pessimist by policy, but an optimist by temperament. I try to anticipate everything that can go wrong, and plan accordingly. Then I can play out the game happily, knowing that I’ve covered every possibility.”
Okay, that’s hopefully mangled from Heinlein’s verbiage, but covers the gist.
I am the exact opposite, a pessimist by temperament but an optimist by policy. I am neurotic as hell, can be downright morose in the short term, but tend to live my life pretty optimistically over the long term, deliberately, and against my nature. It is for this reason I believe perseverance is one of my strongest qualities. It is true that others are capable of sticking to their goals, but I don’t think many people have to contend with a self-sabotaging negatively oriented brain like mine. I have learned to train my brain to argue with itself in its own best interest. The result is that I basically come out a good-natured realist.
I think so. I am pretty cynical about the day to day, but I have hope that things will be great. I’m optimistic that I’ll live to a ripe old age, loving and being loved by my husband, with happy children, etc. If I were purely cynical, I’d say that most likely one of us will die or we’ll get divorced and my PCOS will prevent me from having a couple of happy, healthy children, etc.
While I may be cynical about all the entitled a-holes that come to the bank, I’m optimistic about the future.
I tend to be more optimistic towards external things and more cynical towards my own self or things that will deal with me. But I’m trying to balance the two out now.
I do consider myself to be a cynical optimist though and not an optimistic cynic.
I’m with the Carlin quote as well, you have had to have your ideals and optimism for those ideals to be spoiled before you become cynical, and you still hold hope that that things will become better.
I consider them to be polar opposites. I also believe that attitude can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Hope for the best but expect the worst? The worst is likely to happen. Live as if everything will work out the best, but let go of the outcome is the way to go.