Is man a meat-eater or a vegetarian by nature?

I doubt my local library has much in the way of medical texts, but why should I do that anyway? It’s YOUR claim that gluten is a neurotoxin and (apparently) also your claim that everyone is at risk. If that was true, it seems likely you’d be able to deliver the citation supporting those views without expecting anyone else to do the legwork for you.

You have not provided anything remotely resembling a proper citation for your claims. I’m guessing you just don’t comprehend the requirements for such a thing.

You were warned that this site expects normal English. When someone is obviously not a native speaker we do make allowances, but expect them to type with letters and not numbers when spelling words. You have not conformed to this expectation. Why should we make an exception for you? Because of your claim that normal typing is painful? I don’t believe you based on the quantity of your output. If you typed in normal English you could have used half the characers to say the same thing because we wouldn’t be constantly saying we can’t understand the garbled crap you output, prompting you to type more of the same.

OK, since you’re having trouble with the idea of proving a cite: if the book references “research papers” then go to the book AND TELL US THE CITATION FOR THOSE PAPERS. If the book is legit and the papers genuine then in the back of the book PROPER citations will be made. COPY THEM HERE (in normal English) and then we will be able to independently check up on them on-line, allowing us to draw our own conclusions, including whether or not those papers appeared in a peer-reviewed journal.

Hint: Discover magazine is NOT a peer-reviewed journal.

This is how that sort of debate is done not just here but on-line in general. You make a claim. YOU provide the references to the actual research papers in a format that allows others to go look them up. Failure to do this means you will not be taken seriously. Failing to do this, then whining about it in L33T means you will be taken even less seriously

Oh, bullshit - I don’t believe your claim that you’re in so much pain. Why? Look at the sheer quantity of verbage you have posted.

Type in normal English and you’d find that a lot of that so-called “abuse” mysteriously disappears.

To review:

  1. You make claims and fail to provide cites
  2. You say it’s up to US to research your claims
  3. You claim to have provided references without understanding that acting as a shill to sell books for someone else is NOT providing references
  4. As if it’s not enough that your asking other people to do your homework, you continue to type in a bizarre form of English that makes it hard to understand what the heck you’re saying!

Apparently you don’t realize that your L33T SP33K is about as comprehensible to the average person as pidgen English or Old Scots - it requires considerably more time and effort to decode than more conventional spelling. I don’t buy your coy “oh, I’m in so much pain, this is so much easier to type!” because of the sheet volume of output you have given us.

You have the books, why don’t you just post the relevant quotes here? I don’t believe your sources have any scientific research to back up their claims. If I am wrong, why not just quote the book here?

No, you have provided links to what are, essentially, commercials. Are you getting a commission for whatever those sites sell?

The first point you say as if you visit the library. But this makes me curious as to how you manage to first of all do that, and then turn the pages of a book if typing in plain, legible English, on a keyboard whereby moving a finger a distance of a centimeter and applying slight pressure is such a challenge for you?
Secondly, are you sure it’s lack of ability, as opposed to laziness, and now what seems to be purposely attempting to cause disputes between you and fellow members for personal amusement?
Finally, as well as typing in English, wouldn’t you find it fitting to not post like you’re spamming? Perhaps if you were to use legit sources rather than biased attempts at selling what is continually appearing to be bullsh*t, your argument may have some ‘gluten’ to it.

Gluten FreeMay i also add:
After searching “Is gluten a neurotoxin?” the first item’s description was " Dr. Rodney Ford is a pediatric gastroenterologist who has written 7 books on gluten! He sees gluten as a brain disruptor or neurotoxin."

Now not only would one expect you to cite that as evidence, especially since he has written 7 books which must mean his intelligence ranks him 2nd in the world only to Cecil Adams, but I see myself as an all-powerful mutant organism with a gluten intolerance. Yet just because i see myself as that, it doesn’t mean it to be correct - which it obviously isn’t, though people’s perceptions may differ :wink:
If you want a more serious example, Hitler probably saw himself as doing right, but he couldn’t really have been farther from the truth.

To paraphrase Avatar, I’m probably just talking to the wall here…

[QUOTE=gluten free]

research & testing.


www.recognizingceliacdisease.com
assembled research
www.glutenfreeworks.com (pub site, for above book)

we were directed 2 go hear CLEO LIBONATI RN BSN speak on this, after my family member was
diagnosed. I dd not yet know of my own issues with gluten & that a family member was found gluten intolerant years prior; he survived cancer of intestines, gallbladder, portions of other organs; gluten is cancer promoting.

I have purchased cards from this advocate, published author to hand out 2 people, explaining this & other facts relating 2 gluten.


Dana Korns book, Living Gluten Free for Dummies

Dana Korn’s ‘cheat sheet’ online version(BOOK SAMPLE)

More Series:

The Essentials of Sharing a Kitchen with Gluten

The Essentials of Celiac Disease

The Essentials of Eating Gluten-Free

The Essentials of Gluten Sensitivity

Gluten-Free Cooking For Dummies Cheat Sheet

Celiac Disease For Dummies Cheat Sheet

Living Gluten-Free For Dummies Cheat Sheet (Australian Edition)

Living Gluten-Free For Dummies Cheat Sheet (UK Edition)

Gluten-Free Baking For Dummies Cheat Sheet


National Institutes of Health NIDDK (national institute for Diabetes, Digestive & Kidney Diseases)

which directed us 2 this advocacy group:


which provided us with pamphlets to serve the awareness campaign we held in the community.

(ENTEROLAB also provides information in this format, so I was told by some1 I had referred, there.


QUEST diagnostics

http://www.questdiagnostics.com/hcp/...gastroent.html

http://www.questdiagnostics.com/bran...test_menu.html
these r the best i can give 2 u.
please do not make fun of my lack of ability 2 effectively communicate.
[/QUOTE]

Ok, as noted, this is just a load of horseshit. Your links are mostly links to commercial cites to purchase some book or pamphlet or other. Others are just links to main sites, where if we wanted to figure out what you were on about we’d have to dig through the site to try and figure out what the hell you are on about, and what information on the site might have data concerning this side discussion. It doesn’t work that way here, but I think I’ve beaten that dead horse already somewhere at mid-stream AND checked it’s teeth before taking it as a gift, so just going to quickly illustrate what you would need to do to get taken seriously (not going to mention the other stuff you would need to do, since again that’s been beaten to death).

Here is a Wiki cite discussing Gluten Sensitivity. Yeah, it’s Wiki, so you have to take it with a grain of salt. Still, there is some relevant information in here, so it’s a good place to start. Here are some of the things I think are relevant…feel free to read the whole article if you think the excerpts I post are relevant and you want to see more (see how this works?):

Some additional information from the same article:

To get off of the Wiki bandwagon for a moment, here is a cite from the University of Maryland’s medical center briefly discussing Celiac disease:

Another brief cite from the National Foundation for Celiac Awareness:

Etc etc. Admittedly, I don’t know a lot about this, other than it has similarities in some instances to other food type allergies. Based on what I’m seeing here it ranges from perhaps 1-2% of the population with the critical or accute version of gluten intolerance/wheat allergy/Celiac to perhaps as high as 6% of the population with the more chronic version.

This took about 5 minutes to put together, and it would be an acceptable first post for you to give the background for whatever you are trying to say. It wouldn’t be useful to prove your assertion that gluten is a neurotoxin, since that would take real, solid scientific papers that have been peer reviewed and vetted. It would also help if you know something about medicine, since for me I wouldn’t tackle that without knowing a bit about it before trying to dig in and winkle out the relevant bits to bolster my argument. This was really just a ‘how to’ guild for you to see what’s expected. A link to a relevant cite supporting whatever you are trying to demonstrate. Relevant parts of the cite (not the whole thing as that’s against board rules) clipped out and pasted into your post. Possibly some commentary on why you think what you are quoting is relevant and how it fits into your argument.

Drive by links to sites selling books aren’t what people are looking for. Just thought you should know.

Oh, and btw, this thread was supposed to be about the question of whether man is or isn’t a meat eater by nature. Granted, that one has been pretty much answered, but all this gluten stuff is definitely off the rails wrt the actual discussion.

-XT

I like Gluten. I eat it and it doesn’t bother me.

My coworker is allergic to Gluten. He doesn’t like it.

You and nearly everyone else in the world, apparently - which is what makes it absurd to entertain the notion that it is, in some very general sense, toxic.

If it’s toxic, why aren’t we dying? If we are dying, why haven’tt we noticed?

Well we certainly didn’t ask you to do it.

Nobody is threatening you. That was a stupid joke carrying on a lame gimmick from some other issue on the board, and has nothing to do with you. Ignore it, it was only mildly funny with the context anyway, and without the context it’s just stupid.

Nonsense. You’ve posted 19 posts with over 1000 words (estimated, I didn’t count them all, and I didn’t include quotes). If you’re really in that much pain, you’d have cut out all the gimmicky typing that isn’t really saving you much, drop the whining about how people are being mean to you, and stick with trying to actually post relevant information. Or just give up.

This is preposterous. SDMB uses banner ads provided by outside sources. Those sources use unsophisticated filtering techniques to attempt to match the ads to content on the pages. If enough people mention “blue alien spindlegraphs”, there will start to appear ads about aliens or blue things or spindlegraphs, whatever those are. The cite owner has little control over what is shown. SDMB can get specific ads reported to the server and eliminated, but that is an extreme hassle and not worth it for ads that aren’t actually malicious (like pop ups, automatic sound, virus attacks, etc).

Whereas the site you link is laden with articles and content catering to a specific customer base. It’s the content of the page that makes it suspect. Those two situations are not in the least equivalent.

We *are *dying of acute gluten poisoning, but we are so accustomed to it that we believe we are feeling normal. Symptoms of acute gluten toxicity are the continued use of complete sentences and standard spelling and a propensity to form logical arguments in debates.

We are all doomed.

I think you nailed it.

Dang, this whole time I thought it was bird flu. :smack:

I think it’s DNFTT time.

Im baaaack…
but lucky 4 u i will not stay.

Any1 remember Aretha Franklin & respect? It goes both ways…so, i implore u, b gentle…

IT’S TRU, that gluten can harm; from vanity 2 sanity & lots in between.

It CAN interfere with mental functioning…which means impact 4 mental health & wellness, learning, the criminal justice sys, & is NOT the only consideration, just a big 1.

& cross contaminating of foods a serious issue. gluten is in everything but gf foods obviously, which puts gf foods in routine danger of no longer being glutenless. It comes down 2 parts per million, when considering what makes a food free of gluten officially. If its under 20 ppm, its considered gluten free…but, if u have 5 foodstuffs or more, per day which are @ 20 ppm, u have reached 100ppm or more intake of gluten, which puts u over limit & has serious health consequences 4 those earnestly trying 2 avoid it 4 health reasons…

Im going…

i was told it may have been & it turned out 2 b MONO…& gluten…
was told i just had a severe migraine & 2 go home. I was projectile vomiting & was asked if i felt sick…@ the time i was vo.iting…

I also have something called PARVO.
some1 told me u can exchange it between cats/dogs/humans.
unless i m part feline…which i doubt…

GLUTEN gluten gluten free.
Free of gluten no gluten foods.
If adverts r targeted 4 valid reasons, like, do not drunk drive, share the roads with cyclists, dont start smoking, etc is WORTHWHILE, as r ads catering 2 gluten free…

(COMMENTS regarding my pain u have NO right 2 make & r inaccurate about its levels)

Ive seen ads promoting smoking, gluten, softdrinks, etc my whole life & so likely have u. It is not helpful 2 slander a website attempting betterment, that is a NON PROFIT organization u just bashed which is not harming any1 nor anything but sales of gluten, perhaps, which is barely going 2 make even the smallest dent anyway, considering responses…

I had reflux & other, NON intestinal things…this is not complete. Moreover, there is research some outreach orgs do not share in part because they will lose ‘adherents’ whom find it challenging enough 2 make some accomodations, but r not willing 2 do much more than that…& y i included sources which acknowledge a bit more of the story…& it is not neccessarily intentional that certain findings get overlooked…but there is disagreement on what constitutes certain findings & this does not mean what is disagreed upon is disputable.

Im out.

I used get a newsletter from Dr. Loren Cordain, author of a few books now, and a site called The Paleo Diet (http://thepaleodiet.com/). The newsletter articles are all completely referenced, but are unfortunately no longer available online - he’s selling them now :thumbsdown:

I know he has written for Scientific journals but for those looking for peer reviewed articles, I’m afraid I’m out of my depth.

He subscribes to the idea that we’re better off going back to our pre-agricultural diet (hunter-gatherer - mainly meat, veg & fruit) - as grains (and dairy, and sugar) cause many chronic illnesses. I dont follow the diet myself, but have started eating more protein :slight_smile: To those who think we’ve had a long time to adjust to this new diet of grains, I’ve read that it consists of 5% of our time as a species, and only 0.4% of our time on earth if you include Homo Habilis & Erectus.

I quote a referenced article from one of his newsletters below, titled “A 10,000 Year Old Riddle of Bread and Milk Solved”. It’s a facinating interpretation of how we adjusted to the new diet, explaining along the way, oddly enough, why only North Europeans are white - and able to digest milk. Any yes, it’s related to diet changes - in particular, grains.

[spoiler]The Paleo Diet Newsletter—May 15, 2006

[…]

THIS MONTH’S FOCUS:
A 10,000 Year Old Riddle of Bread and Milk Solved

Introduction

Most nutrition students know that dietary proteins are not absorbed by the intestines because they are broken down into their component amino acids by enzymes in the gut during the digestive process.  Even if dietary proteins escape proteolytic (protein shearing) degradation in the gut, they are normally denied entry into the bloodstream by various gut, liver and immune system barriers. 
For the past 20 years the pharmaceutical industry has been keenly interested in figuring out a way in which to get intact proteins past the gut barrier and into the bloodstream — and rightly so.   A billion dollar market would be instantly opened up to any company that could develop a procedure to transport insulin (a large protein molecule) across the gut barrier without directly injecting it into the bloodstream.  An insulin pill would be a diabetic patient’s dream come true.   Well guess what? The day in which an insulin pill will become a reality is getting closer.

As a Paleo Diet fan, you may be scratching your head and saying, “So-what – why should I be interested in an insulin pill. Shouldn’t proper diet and exercise be the preferred approach for treating type 2 diabetics?” You are absolutely correct, but the relevance of the insulin pill for Paleo Diet devotees is not to be necessarily found in the clinical application, but rather in the pathway whereby intact proteins gain access to the bloodstream. This pathway and its nutritional ramifications represent one of the most fascinating and relevant evolutionary tales in all of human history.

… [MATERIAL DELETED BY MODERATOR][/spoiler]FWIW I’m just throwing this out here cause I find it fascinating - I’m not here to defend it - I do find it & him very persuasive, but that dont qualify me to debate this :wink:

edit/ to be honest I havent read this thread beyond page two because I wasnt getting much out of it. And I’m not posting this in response to anyone, I just felt it was interesting and on topic.
Thanks, Tom