I can understand tribal leaders in small villages being elected to (or otherwise earning) a leadership position for a tribe of, say, 20 people. Many townships have their own elected mayor and/or city council as well, possibly ruling over 5000 people. Scale this up and you get counties (half a million?), states (few million?), countries (few hundred million?), etc.
My question is: Does the effectiveness of this sort of government demonstrably/quantifiably scale with the number of constituents?
At the tribal level, you would have pretty much direct contact with all your constituents. At the national level, one elected representative (or a group of them) would have advisors and industry representatives and special interest groups, etc., because there’s no way one human being can talk to all the millions s/he might represent.
How do you calculate the upper limit for which this sort of layered representation exceeds the capabilities of a single human mind? Is that even an issue or can things but sufficiently abstracted as they scale up so that one person can understand everything that’s happening, just with decreasing levels of detail?
Sorry, I wish I could phrase this better. If anyone understands what I’m trying to ask and can put it in better words, please do