Is that a "Banned" I see

[Ritter]

Thanks for the explanation Some User Name. I feel a bit bad for disclosing that Night Rabbit was on my ignore list, but holy nutsacks, what a provocative poster.

[Justin_Bailey]

@Eyebrows 0f Doom

I remember that. When the connection was brought up it made so much sense to me, their styles of posting were so similar and several details about their life were the same (20-something female in NYC who was dating much older boss who bought her gifts, both of them always started stupid Pit threads that would turn back on them, etc.) IIRC she denied the accusation, saying she had never heard of nongoog, so I’m curious how it was proven they were the same.

That was nongoog? Jesus, I’d totally forgotten what name went with that wack job story. Makes me feel a little better than I didn’t like NightRabbit much and I could never really put my finger on why.

[Kayeby]

@Liberal

You’re ironically mocking the morality of someone who can’t even defend herself against you. And you love it, no less. You’re a douche.

I feel that mocking a banned poster (on a noble board, no less!) possibly rates above buying expensive handbags, below fucking another woman’s husband, and is maybe equal to being a disproportionately explosive cuntbag message board poster on the douchery scale.

|
|___ fucking another woman’s husband
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|___ message board shennanigans
|
|
|___ buying expensive handbags
|
|___ giving to charity

[jimmmy]

@MsRobyn

That’s because you’re being a vacuous slut when you do that stuff. When she does it, it’s okay.

The joys of rationalization and moral relativism. The things that make NightRabbit what she is.

Robin

Don’t you guys think she was probably trolling us? That would be in character & maybe a reason to have multiple user names - to sit on your Olympian throne and laugh as you kickover the anthill and attempt mightily to stir up enormous sh^tstorms.

[Rubystreak]

@jimmmy

Don’t you guys think she was probably trolling us? That would be in character & maybe a reason to have multiple user names - to sit on your Olympian throne and laugh as you kickover the anthill and attempt mightily to stir up enormous sh^tstorms.

Possibly. But she told the same damn stories in both personae-- the evils of temping, the dating woes, the contempt for other women, etc. If you’re just kicking over anthills, why not be creative about it? You’d be a lot less likely to get caught, and thus it would be even more fun.

[Q.E.D]

@Rubystreak

If you’re just kicking over anthills, why not be creative about it? You’d be a lot less likely to get caught, and thus it would be even more fun.

Yeah, but you’re assuming she wasn’t stupid.

[Liberal]

@Kayeby

I feel that mocking a banned poster (on a noble board, no less!) possibly rates above buying expensive handbags, below fucking another woman’s husband, and is maybe equal to being a disproportionately explosive cuntbag message board poster on the douchery scale.

We tend to judge ourselves by our intentions, and others by their behavior.

[wring]

now a 2 month suspension ??? some one around that long doesn’t know the rules?

[TokyoBayer]

@wring

now a 2 month suspension ??? some one around that long doesn’t know the rules?

Does this mean that it’s fair game to trash her, since she’ll have her chance to come back and even the score?

[bbs2k]

@wring

now a 2 month suspension ??? some one around that long doesn’t know the rules?

Wow, that’s actually really cool. Kudos to the staff for showing a fair change of decision. I just hope she doesn’t do anything stupid again.