I thought she “continued to test negative”?
Good luck with it being admissible in court.
From the link there was a couple of things that jumped out at me:
1.
IANAL, but I am fairly certain that would be unlawful to tape record the conversation with out the permission of the personnel from the Health Department. :dubious: If it is in fact against the law, I would think a lawyer might know this.
2. Read the following two quotes from the article and tell me what is wrong with this picture
Now wait just a minute, read the underlined part again. I assume that any half way decent hospital can treat standard TB. After all they have been doing it for many many years. If he was told the only place he could get effective treatment was in Denver at the place that specializes in turbo TB (I love that term) then it says to me that this slimeball either knew before he left he had turbo TB not the regular kind, or he (and the doctors) had a real strong suspicion that he had it, but the lab tests confirming it had not come back yet.
I am voting for he is trying to cover his ass, and not doing the best job of it.
Again, go back and read where other posters say, that EVEN WITH REGULAR TB, people were advised not to go out, even to shop because they might spread the sickness! What part of that idea is so hard for you to extrapolate into the concept that “If they say that for “normal” TB, then surely they use even stronger wording for a case that might be XDR-TB”?
No, they said that being in close quarters for lengthy amounts of time would risk infection. They also said that infection could be spread just by talking. (ETA: IOW, sharing air with the carrier/sick person.) Sex wasn’t mentioned at all, IIRC.
Why wouldn’t it be admissible?
He was under the impression that he had something between “the regular kind” and what he was eventually diagnosed with.
Then he knew better to go overseas, and he ALSO knew better than to travel back to the USA via plane and car once he heard his diagnosis of XDR-TB!
I imagine there were two factors involved:
- He thought he would die if he stayed in Italy.
- The advice that is given is more of a precautionary measure (not saying it is, but he may have thought so), and that he felt as though he could return home without infecting anyone. Add to that his wife’s failure to contract the disease despite spending months with him & he probably thought the risk of infecting someone in a few hours was close to zero.
After weighing 1) and 2), he decided to risk it.
I love how you continue to say things that I have repeatedly agreed with.
How was your trip, Mr. Nixon?
By the way, nobody has yet to demonstrate that he was more contagious after he was diagnosed with XDR. The fact that none of the passengers from any of his flights have been quarantined is interesting to me.
Well, it might be admissible in court against you. Isn’t recording conversations without the other party’s consent illegal in many jurisdictions?
It takes weeks to run the test for XDR-TB, we wouldn’t know yet. I’m puzzled that you keep defending him with “yeah, buts”. What he did was wrong, period. There is no excuse for his behavior.
It’s not illegal in my jurisdiction. Anyway, I am not aware of any general rule that makes illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in civil proceedings.
I am just trying to understand his reasoning. You may think there is no excuse, but he may have felt like he had a damn good one, especially if nobody contracts the disease.
I’m most certainly not defending everything he did, I just refuse to believe the guy is as evil as everyone is dying to believe. Having met him, I know that he isn’t.
Douchebag is the first person to be quarantined in the US in 40 years, and I have a strong feeling that the only reason he’s been quarantined is because he’s got the habit of running all over the place. Additionally, many of the people who were exposed to this bozo are outside of the US, and given the US-centric nature of the news, it doesn’t surprise me a bit that we haven’t heard a thing about what’s going on with those folks. Hell, we probably haven’t even found all of them as of yet.
Ignorance fought, here.
Yes, but if you broke the law to obtain that evidence (unlike say, a police officer failing to follow proper proceedure), I’d be surprised if you didn’t, at the very least, get to have a meeting with the local authorities.