[QUOTE=Capatalist Lion Tamer]
I think most of this could have been avoided had the CDC not hoisted several red flags and generally given him the mushroom treatment from the get-go.
[/quote]
OR, alternatively, it could have been avoided if he had done what he was told by the CDC in Italy (not to fly). OR done as recommended by the Fulton County Health Department in Atlanta (not to fly). OR done as most other reasonable people would have done when told of the likelihood that they have a very serious strain of a disease which, if they have it, will necessitate months of treatment at a particular facility in the U.S.: wait and find out for sure, instead of going to Europe. In other words, there are many ways this could have been avoided, it’s just that most of them require him to take personal responsibility and not be a selfish asshole.
If you believe your life is on the line, you don’t jet off to Europe. If you are told by the CDC that you cannot fly because you pose a danger to others – and you have not received any contemporaneous information from an expert in the field that this is NOT in fact the case – then you do not fly. Unless you are a selfish asshole.
This is precisely why the next person will not have the option to “decide” whether he or she will weigh the CDC’s “request” and then flee, placing their own layman’s judgment and self-motivated convenience or personal fear over the hazard to the public’s health. At the time he made these decisions, he could not have KNOWN whether he was acting in a reasonably safe manner or not. THAT is what makes his actions so irresponsible.
“Not enough to outweigh” in his very own layman’s opinion, you mean. And, for the zillionth time, contagiousness is not the extent of the relevant inquiry regarding whether someone presents a public health hazard. I assume you keep harping on contagiousness because you actually have no argument on the issue of whether or not he could have presented a public health hazard for other reasons, such a severity or drug resistance.
Then he didn’t have enough information to know whether he was or wasn’t a public hazard, did he? Because no answer does not give you any more information that you are NOT a public health hazard then you had before, right? So he knew SOMETHING had changed for the worse – he went from being able to fly to not being able to fly – but he didn’t know what it was. At that point, he had two choices: (1) Do as directed by the CDC, placing himself in their hands or (2) staying put and getting more information from experts on the same level as the CDC, and with the same information as the CDC until a determination was made. His reasonable choices did NOT include haring off without knowing whether he was a public health hazard or not. THAT is the heart of his irresponsibility: He didn’t know whether he was endangering others or not, and he did it anyway.
The real question at this point is why you have your nose so far up the guy’s ass. Is he your brother or something?