Here’s why I find Magellan’s position so baffling… he seems to think that:
(1) if gay marriage becomes legal, straight people will get married less
(2) straight people getting married less is bad
What I don’t see is any evidence, or even any logic, for (1). Evidence-wise, I feel like the burden of proof is on Magellan if he’s the one trying to deny people rights. And logic-wise, I feel like logic is AGAINST him. So a young person (who is straight) grows up and has an uncle Bruce and uncle Jack who are in love and live together. Which is more likely to cause that straight person to think that marriage is something valuable and worthy… if Bruce and Jack ARE married or if they are NOT married? It’s so obviously the first in my view that it just baffles me that anyone could disagree. If you want someone to value marriage, then it should be something that they see as many positive models of as possible, and you do NOT want them to see people who are committed and together but NOT married, lest they model their behavior on that.
(There are also a host of other problems with Magellan’s position, particularly including the issue of separate-but-equal, but the above is one that just seems like a complete slam dunk.) (And I’m not at all certain that I agree that we should base our policies on whether they increase or decrease the rate of straight marriage… but if we do, then I think legalizing SSM is just clearly the correct choice.)
I think chris4 is so new to the boards he or she didn’t realise the OP was months old, and that the comment would be appended to several pages of debate.
There are many problems gay marriage may create that nobody has even thought about. I probably could name a few of them, but I’m sure that most of us would neglect things that could occur because of this new thing.
One example is the woman who wanted to marry her dolphin! :smack:
There could be lots of things similar to that occurring. Gay marriage is not the same as discrimination because of color, poverty, or even religion. Those are things you can see.
Can you fake being gay? Yes! Yes!! Yes!!! And some would do it all the way to the bank.
It used to be that if you were a Christian it was hard to be considered a bigot. I guess I am one now!
Here’s why I find Magellan’s position so baffling… he seems to think that:
(1) if gay marriage becomes legal, straight people will get married less
(2) straight people getting married less is bad
What I don’t see is any evidence, or even any logic, for (1). Evidence-wise, I feel like the burden of proof is on Magellan if he’s the one trying to deny people rights.
(This sounds like an atheist argument. They say the same thing!)
(The feelings one has for either gender are most certainly not a choice, they simply are; the butterflies that hit you in the gut are not a choice, they are just there. The choice is whether or not one acts on such feelings.
Martina Navratilova on Gay Marriage
90% of gays are atheists.)
(That is why I will fight this to the death, because it’s actually more serious than death!!! As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
Please name them. I’d love to hear something no one else has offered.
Sorry, we’ve heard this one a million times before. Marrying animals has no more in common with gay marriage then it does with straight marriage.
Discrimination against gays is the same as those other sorts of discrimination. You’ve certainly done nothing to show that they’re different.
So what? Who cares if you can fake being gay? You can also fake being a Christian, or an atheist, or a police officer, or a doctor, or governor, or a million other things.
There were lots of things that used to be so that we now recognize were foolish.
If you believe gay people are morally inferior to straight people, then yes you are. If you believe that gay people should not have the same rights as straight people, then yes you are. If you believe that homosexual acts should be punished by law, then yes you are.
Citation needed. Also, assuming homosexuals are overwhelmingly irreligious, you think this has anything to do with the massive bigotry most religions display against them?