So complain to Jesse Jackson; he’s often considered a black leader, but he’s the one putting forth the people of color category (presumably he puts himself in it, too), showing he doesn’t see anything wrong with it. And my invoking PC is due to the fact that
**
In other words, these groups see themselves as friends of everybody-but-whites, and so they’re turning on its head what originally was a term of opprobrium.
It’s as if Jackson & the others are saying “the mean old ‘white’ people think they can put all the other ‘races’ down by calling them ‘colored’. Well, we’ll turn it into a badge of honor, and unite against them.”
As far as I know, it’s not those prejudiced in favor of whites against the others that use the term people of color, but those who see themselves as standing up for their rights.
For what it’s worth, I agree with you. I think it’s stupid. But so is all this ethnic hatred shit.
IIRC, non-native is an asocial Korean teenager living in Central America. He’s not complaining to any particular ethnic or cultural group, he is complaining about a general trend to lump all non-white people into one broad category of “coloured” or “people of color”. It is understandable that he might not feel any particular kinship with, for example, an African American woman from Hoboken.
AFAIK the basis for the term “people of color” was to join all non-white minorities together into a plurality and eventually a majority. This was chiefly a political strategy which doesn’t really make sense outside of the US. In Guatemala, for example, “whites” constitute only about 2% of the population. Ladinos (people of mixed Spanish and indigenous descent) would make up about 55% of the population. Indigenous amerindians would make up about 43%. So most people are “coloured”, to some extent.
Somebody mentioned in a previous post where Jesse Jackson talked about the poor, both white and “people of color”. I understand why he makes this distinction, since many people in the US still seem to equate poor with black or hispanic, but the truth is that there are poor people of every ethnic variety you would care to imagine. Personally for me, if you are going to do something for poor people, it should be done irrespective of skin hue.
In South Africa, IIRC, “coloured” was a category reserved for anybody who was not African (indigenous peoples) or white (descendants of European settlers, chiefly from the Netherlands and England). This could include people of mixed European and African descent, or other immigrant groups. I don’t recall if Indian immigrants were considered coloured or a separate category during Apartheid, but they are listed separately in the references I can find right now.
One reason that I personally find coloured as an offensive term is that people will use this as a fast way to lump people together, regardless of other dissimilarities. I also find it strange the way people of mixed lineage are categorized, and fail to understand the purpose of it. Eventually everyone will likely be mixed together with someone else, and the difficulty of fitting people into categories will necessitate discarding this untenable system.