Is the word "girl" for an adult female human inherently offensive?

No word is “inherently” anything. Context always matters.

Words are arbitrary combinations of sounds that accumulate connotations through use. How people use a word creates meaning.

If “girl” has a sufficient history of use that undermines the status of adult women in society, then that is a reason to avoid it, not because of any inherent characteristics.

You appear to miss my point. What I’m actually saying is that there is no female equivalent to “guy” or “dude.” And so “girl” has evolved to fill that place.

“Girl” is both the female version of “boy” and of “guy.” “Gal” didn’t take off. And “dudette” is surfer lingo.

I do argue this lexical gap is because women were historically infantilized. But I can’t force the existence of a new word to fill in the gap. I have to accept that “girl” will be used in contexts where “guy” would be used for a man.

That said, in this particular instance, there’s precedent for using a more formal term than usual for service jobs. I’ve heard people say the “mail lady” or the “beer lady.” So I think the better term for this situation is “Fiji Water lady.”

But I don’t get too upset at “Fiji Water girl,” either, as that is the current English-language female equivalent to “Fiji Water guy.”

“Beer lady”?
“Beer lady”?

You heard someone refer to another human being as a “beer lady”?

Details please, I’m laughing out loud imagining possible explanations.:slight_smile:

Thailand has beer girls. They hang out in regular – not brothel-type – pubs and restaurants promoting certain brands of beer. They will be dressed in the colors of the brand. Some examples can be seen here.

Every Japanese baseball game has beer girls running through the stands topping up spectators’ glasses. Info here.

I think I’d still rather go with Duffman.

Context is everything, but overall, you should address people by their name, or whatever is most proper for the social situation. I don’t want anyone calling me boy, or dude – offensive is not the right term though. I would feel annoyed and disrespected. Call me by my name, or if you don’t know my name, ask me what it is. I would say that when in doubt (ie., if you haven’t already established that the person will or won’t take offense) simply call them by their name. Why even mess around? I don’t get it? Why make this so complicated? People, whoever they are, may prefer being addressed in certain way. Other forms of address, offensive or not, would not be preferable to using the preferred way of addressing someone. Ma’am or Miz, or Mrs. for a woman during formal occasions, First name for informal, etc.

Yes, the US has beverage promotional girls. who do promo work for the big national labels. Nobody would ever refer to them as “beer ladies”. Craft breweries like to deride the national breweries over this. A local brewery sent a beer-boy to a beer event. He was an overweight dude in a bathing suit and flip flops who was very knowledgeable about beer and very funny as well. The line to get a picture with him was longer than the beer-girl picture lines.

For the OP, I’ve made a conscious effort to think and use woman instead of girl for adult females, though I still might slip up from time to time.

I think King Elizabeth would disagree with you. What you are showing is a manifestation of patriarchy, where the office is assumed to be male because, duh, men are the ones who hold power.

Say what? Offensive?

No, it sounds offensive either way. If you’re 92, I may let it pass with a chuckle and a pat on the head, old boy.

Agreed.

I don’t see that from the lyrics. https://genius.com/amp/Christina-aguilera-what-a-girl-wants-lyrics
She wants a man who will be by her side and support her while she is a bit lost, one who will be faithful. But be the boss? Not seeing it.

Materteral
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/materteral

Um, what?

Huh?

I think it’s more of robbing women of authority.

This is a different case. They’re using the low status term to rob women of their status.

A distinction without a difference.

Referring to a man as “a male” or a woman or women as “a female” or “females” is associated with police and military jargon and I perceive it as tending to be objectifying and dehumanizing.

The most jarring contexts are when a young black man is referred to as a “young black male” because that’s a common way to hear cops describe a criminal suspect. And when men “on the prowl” start referring to “females,” it feels very creepy and objectifying.